Yet more constraints stuff :-)
Mark Prior <mrp@itd.adelaide.edu.au> Mon, 12 April 1993 19:19 UTC
Received: from aggie.ucdavis.edu by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA04712; Mon, 12 Apr 93 12:19:29 -0700
Received: from ucdavis.ucdavis.edu by aggie.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA07934; Mon, 12 Apr 93 10:02:24 -0700
Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA03521; Mon, 12 Apr 93 02:50:13 -0700
Sender: ietf-wnils-request@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu
Received: from jarrah.itd.adelaide.edu.au by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA03515; Mon, 12 Apr 93 02:49:28 -0700
Received: by jarrah.itd.adelaide.edu.au with SMTP (5.61+IDA+MU/UA-5.26) id AA28634; Mon, 12 Apr 1993 19:17:19 +0930
Message-Id: <9304120947.AA28634@jarrah.itd.adelaide.edu.au>
To: ietf-wnils@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu
Subject: Yet more constraints stuff :-)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1993 19:17:19 +0930
From: Mark Prior <mrp@itd.adelaide.edu.au>
Now that we have hold as a constraint we probably need to allow all commands to have constraints. I was just trying "constraints:hold" with my (latest version) server and discovered it didn't like it. At present "constraints", "describe", and "version" don't accept global constraints. Should they? Mark.
- Yet more constraints stuff :-) Mark Prior