Re: Comments on the centroids paper
Chris Weider <clw@merit.edu> Tue, 14 September 1993 13:08 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03143; 14 Sep 93 9:08 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03120; 14 Sep 93 9:08 EDT
Received: from ucdavis.ucdavis.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11558; 14 Sep 93 9:08 EDT
Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA27052; Tue, 14 Sep 93 05:50:01 PDT
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-wnils-request@ucdavis.edu
Received: from aggie.ucdavis.edu by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA26990; Tue, 14 Sep 93 05:48:06 PDT
Received: from merit.edu by aggie.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.05) id AA02357; Tue, 14 Sep 93 05:46:49 -0700
Return-Path: <clw@merit.edu>
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA21529; Tue, 14 Sep 93 08:45:53 -0400
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1993 08:45:53 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Chris Weider <clw@merit.edu>
Message-Id: <9309141245.AA21529@merit.edu>
To: ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu
Subject: Re: Comments on the centroids paper
Cc: ietf-wnils@aggie.ucdavis.edu, schoultz@admin.kth.se
The metadata cache in Nomenclator seems to me to get a lot of its benefit from the fact that the X.500 naming scheme encourages segregation of certain record types. I'm not sure such will be the case when we have grab-bag whois++ servers with a broad mix of records. But, again, experience will tell... Chris
- Comments on the centroids paper Rickard Schoultz
- Re: Comments on the centroids paper Chris Weider
- Re: Comments on the centroids paper Simon E Spero
- Re: Comments on the centroids paper Chris Weider