Unicode progress
Chris Weider <clw@merit.edu> Mon, 18 October 1993 17:34 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07587; 18 Oct 93 13:34 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07581; 18 Oct 93 13:34 EDT
Received: from ucdavis.ucdavis.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09924; 18 Oct 93 13:34 EDT
Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA05806; Mon, 18 Oct 93 09:48:43 PDT
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-wnils-request@ucdavis.edu
Received: from merit.edu by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA04861; Mon, 18 Oct 93 09:34:39 PDT
Return-Path: <clw@merit.edu>
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA26396; Mon, 18 Oct 93 12:36:57 -0400
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1993 12:36:57 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Chris Weider <clw@merit.edu>
Message-Id: <9310181636.AA26396@merit.edu>
To: dank@blacks.jpl.nasa.gov
Subject: Unicode progress
Cc: clw@merit.edu, ietf-wnils@ucdavis.edu
Dan: It certainly sounds like some major industry players are backing this, and it sounds like they might have the muscle to mandate this. One concern I have is that we have some practical experience with this before it gets widely deployed... Could you send me (or even better, post to the WNILS list) the papers for the Plan 9 use of Unicode? In addition, I seem to remember some problems with Japanese / Chinese arguments over characters that look the same but needed to have different encodings for political reasons... Has that been settled? In addition, this is a problem we're facing in a lot of places; in the URN discussions, the data element discussions, etc. With your permission, I'd like to forward your messages to those lists as well. Chris Weider
- Unicode progress Chris Weider
- Re: Unicode progress Masataka Ohta
- Re: Unicode progress Chris Weider