Re: [woes] Naked Public Key, was: RE: Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition

Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> Mon, 08 August 2011 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@adida.net>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9112B21F8B2F for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwEm1Y5PsQZo for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FDB21F857D for <woes@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C25420865 for <woes@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:43:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:43:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=9lYSKKa0dAocktlnAwHbft mlVDQ=; b=obejdDJjT2z+m5ZKabowr3jaY17MfWUMuFtd7W5se8McYhGuSh5EKC XpuIzvOkcS1vSaIj5U4dR2kaQmeo5QmAVqtmiZC0x0EGheSbDqUphTicVeJwjyxK mv4QwSpWAbinvb/XpsmV3yCna1lZK4KulCmJFsvSU4B2A7h1WAwKU=
X-Sasl-enc: E/HGES6LigEzwjxgRdMVLOI2nr973IOh3D5w7c1QYcka 1312825380
Received: from Ben-Adidas-MacBook-Pro.local (c-67-188-2-67.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.2.67]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B612845ABEB for <woes@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:43:00 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4E402023.4000603@adida.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:42:59 -0700
From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: woes@ietf.org
References: <0c100e09-dad3-4cc5-87a2-b42f1f6c834b@default> <4E4011CC.7030903@adida.net> <1312823364.5484.21.camel@dynamo> <DD481E68-7917-4F79-86E2-244A3D87FFAD@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <DD481E68-7917-4F79-86E2-244A3D87FFAD@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [woes] Naked Public Key, was: RE: Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:42:35 -0000

On 8/8/11 10:38 AM, John Bradley wrote:
> We just can't assume that it is trivial to reemployment PKIX X.509
> processing in all new environments. Using public keys without PKIX, is a
> simpler task.

Exactly. And even the certificate format world could use a *much* 
simpler, more webby approach than X.509.

-Ben