Re: [woes] New WOES charter proposal

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: woes-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:woes-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 10:29 AM
To: Matt Miller
Cc: woes@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [woes] New WOES charter proposal

That works for me. Certainly when I talk about basing something on CMS, what I mean is that I'm imitating CMS, not that there is a normative dependency.

-Ekr

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2011, at 13:16, Leif Johansson wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/25/2011 06:59 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
>>> I now find myself hoping this is not the beginning someone making a 
>>> case for ASN.1 encoding in WOES.
>>>
>>> For my edification, can someone comment on how CMS would likely be 
>>> referenced in WOES? Would it likely be a normative reference (i.e. 
>>> key transport/wrapping, as it is in xmlenc-core), or otherwise would 
>>> it probably be just informational?
>>
>> We seem to be bike-shedding on the words "based on" in the charter.
>> Perhaps it helps if we say something to the effect that WOES draws 
>> upon experience from CMS and XML-dsig/enc and leave it at that.
>>
>
> +1
>
>
> - m&m
>
> Matt Miller - <mamille2@cisco.com>
> Collaboration Software Group - Cisco Systems, Inc.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> woes mailing list
> woes@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
>
>
_______________________________________________
woes mailing list
woes@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes