Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 03 August 2011 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E05621F8B6B for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 06:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knWBzLcl1fxy for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 06:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68A421F8574 for <woes@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 06:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p73DiieE068914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 06:44:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E38B10B.8060202@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 06:45:03 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A596C4B-825B-482F-B171-2C7C6410E77B@vpnc.org>
References: <4F25253E-A870-4956-AAB1-20890B655984@vpnc.org> <4E38B10B.8060202@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: woes@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:44:54 -0000

On Aug 2, 2011, at 7:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Looks good, although the dates seem a mite aggressive, especially since
> it's doubtful that the WG would be approved this month (given the need
> for internal IESG review, external review, and an IESG decision).

There is nothing stopping the two sets of authors from working together pre-WG. :-)

--Paul Hoffman