Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B543E21F8B9A for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 06:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yhj1H8ezBa2u for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 06:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68D721F8B71 for <woes@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 06:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk15 with SMTP id 15so990496qyk.10 for <woes@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 06:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.210.131 with SMTP id gk3mr587959qab.11.1312462962793; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 06:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.211] ([190.22.14.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w12sm1325788qct.24.2011.08.04.06.02.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 04 Aug 2011 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CF8C71FD-F4AE-48A1-9002-B79A8A135982"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgyJsQEm8Jm=UDQf-e9EOu-P78PoKtEB8VmvRcBE_OpeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:02:48 -0400
Message-Id: <7B2B91BF-E2F9-4D27-BB04-35DE4D352FC2@ve7jtb.com>
References: <4F25253E-A870-4956-AAB1-20890B655984@vpnc.org> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0E743D3330@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <4E39B44C.1070706@stpeter.im> <4E39B483.7080101@stpeter.im> <8499B724-BC3D-4124-B8B2-B1FF762020E3@ve7jtb.com> <CAMm+LwgyJsQEm8Jm=UDQf-e9EOu-P78PoKtEB8VmvRcBE_OpeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: "woes@ietf.org" <woes@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:02:29 -0000

Good info.

This particular company is currently more on the asserting there IPR portfolio end of the spectrum at the moment.  
That perhaps makes them more aware of the risks.

Thanks
John B.
On 2011-08-04, at 8:52 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:
> Yes I was getting some grief from one of the large venders about openID Connect being based on JSON because it is not a standard like XML.
> 
> They were just being general prats about IPR things.
> 
> This might be the reason for the concern:
> 
> http://www.virginiaiplaw.com/2011/03/articles/patent-litigation/judge-brinkema-grants-summary-judgment-to-defendants-in-tecsec-v-ibm-patent-case/
> 
> 
> I can't go into the details of the case as I was a defense expert for another defendant.
>  
> -- 
> Website: http://hallambaker.com/
>