IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [woes] naming

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Wed, 27 July 2011 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D63411E81A6 for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zyockb2JJCMv for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8246111E8182 for <woes@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxp4 with SMTP id 4so1270073yxp.31 for <woes@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.9.36 with SMTP id 36mr77933wfi.314.1311793349204; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-560f.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-560f.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.86.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z6sm152650pbc.14.2011.07.27.12.02.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C6BDCA27-42A7-40D9-8534-C10C7DC38D67"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E305C63.1010503@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:02:18 -0400
Message-Id: <F2B0A75F-BF5C-43C2-9EE0-7D0979291062@ve7jtb.com>
References: <4E305C63.1010503@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: "woes@ietf.org" <woes@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [woes] naming
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:02:33 -0000

Woes makes me think of a Muddy Waters song. 

> Javascript Object Signing and Encrypting (JOSE)

Works for us South Americans.  Though I will insist on pronouncing it correctly.

John B.
On 2011-07-27, at 2:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Encryption and Signing for JavaScript Applications = ESJA?
> 
> Pronounced "essjay" (Wikipedia users might get the joke)...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> woes mailing list
> woes@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email