Re: [woes] WOES Charter Proposal

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

Sure, it seems reasonable to discuss draft-zyp-json-schema-03 in the
Apps Area. It recently expired, so I'll ping the authors about bringing
it back to life.

On 6/16/11 2:29 PM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> Kris has most of what we need already in his JSON Schema draft.
> 
> 
> On 6/16/11 2:14 PM, "Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> I guess I'd worry about the added time if its a dependency but maybe there're
>> ways around that. (Developing new schema stuff sounds to me like a slooow
>> thing;-)
>>
>> S
>>
>> On 16 Jun 2011, at 20:43, "Peter Saint Andre" <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, that seems not unreasonable.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Joe Hildebrand
>>> To: Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: Mike Jones <[e-mail]>; Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN -
>>> FI/Espoo) <[e-mail]>; ext Manger, James H
>>> <[e-mail]>; Sean Turner <[e-mail]>;
>>> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Peter
>>> Saint Andre; Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>
>>> Sent: Thu Jun 16 12:21:56 2011
>>> Subject: Re: [woes] WOES Charter Proposal
>>>
>>> Agree that 4 is scope creep that is outside of the scope of normal security
>>> area stuff, but it's likely to be a prereq.  I'm fine with dropping it from
>>> the charter, potentially getting support from the Apps ADs to move stuff
>>> like JSON Schema through the Apps AWG.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/16/11 11:51 AM, "Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3 & 4 there look a bit like scope-creep to me
>>>>
>>>> Why are they absolutely needed?
>>>>
>>>> S.
>>>>
>>>> On 16/06/11 18:33, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>>>>> Slight tweaks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/16/11 11:26 AM, "Mike Jones" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>    1) A JSON-based method of applying digital signatures and keyed message
>>>>>> digests to data that may represent JSON data structures.
>>>>>
>>>>> ... may represent arbitrary data, including JSON data structures and text
>>>>>
>>>>>>    2) A JSON-based method of applying encryption to data that may
>>>>>> represent
>>>>>> JSON data structures.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same as 1) above.  Not just for JSON.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Separately, we may want to consider whether the following should be in
>>>>>> scope:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    3) A JSON-based method of representing public keys.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, please update and/or add these references (some were out of date,
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> were missing):
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's also add:
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) Any JSON-specific prerequisite tooling such as JSON Schema
>>>>>
>>>>> And add draft-zyp-json-schema as a reference.  I CC'd Kris Zyp to see if
>>>>> he's ok with that.  Kris: this might be a chance for a WG to pick up JSON
>>>>> Schema if you like.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Joe Hildebrand
>>>