IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [woes] WOES Charter Proposal

"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 14 June 2011 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A385911E815E for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vw-4+uQADH1M for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4831B11E8155 for <woes@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3244 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jun 2011 17:25:42 -0000
Received: from 194.29.195.214 by rms-de006.v300.gmx.net with HTTP
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="========GMXBoundary43791308072340278875"
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:25:40 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20110614172540.43790@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, woes@ietf.org
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: GMX.net Web Mailer
x-registered: 0
X-GMX-UID: o6HCeVBbRkkNaYcZsWVqRUZudWkvKJN/
Subject: Re: [woes] WOES Charter Proposal
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:25:56 -0000

> 1) A Standards Track document specifying how to apply a digital > signature and a keyed message digest to > JSON encoded data. <question> I want to be clear that when we're talking about digital signatures we're not talking about HMAC-y operations. If you want to include this here then it need to be reflected earlier as something different than digital signatures. </question> I personally like to distinguish the usage of asymmetric from symmetric algorithms. Some people use the term digital signatures for both; I don't. When I use the term digitial signature I am not talking about HMAC-based operations.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email