Re: [Wpack] Call for adoption of draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-exchanges

Shouldn't you adopt the use cases first? The scope of activities and the "Expected Performance" (section 3) are critical.
The use cases I had expected that an IETF "Web Packaging" working group to work on would include would be the ones that led to mime multipart: 
Multipart/related, multipart/form-data, multipart/alternative, multipart/byte-ranges
Each has its own set of requirements,

--
https://LarryMasinter.net https://interlisp.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wpack <wpack-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Sean Turner
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 7:52 PM
> To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> Cc: WPACK List <wpack@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Wpack] Call for adoption of draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-
> exchanges
> 
> Mark,
> 
> You make a good point about the need for the additional I-Ds, because the
> charter’s milestones actually call out 3 other I-Ds that address the signing
> mechanism as well as privacy and security. To be blunt, these other I-Ds have
> not yet been submitted. There was some security-related text in the bundle
> document that was removed and Martin Thomson had a content-based
> origin I-D. I am cautiously optimistic that getting the bundling I-D adopted will
> encourage the other I-Ds to surface because I strongly suspect that progress
> on the bundling I-D is likely to grind to a halt without those I-Ds. I do not think
> that the milestones, which are also a good year out of date at this point,
> should hold us back from adopting the bundling I-D. But, the entire set of I-
> Ds is required- it is the pact we made the IESG to get to done.
> 
> spt
> 
> > On Mar 16, 2021, at 00:59, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > I don't have access to minutes of the meeting yet, so this may have already
> been answered --
> >
> > The charter says that a use cases document, a privacy analysis document,
> and a security analysis document will be adopted at the same time as the
> bundling document. What's their status?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >> On 16 Mar 2021, at 11:53 am, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Based on interest expressed at IETF 110, this email starts the call for
> adoption of draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-exchanges. The I-D can be found
> here:
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-
> exchanges/
> >>
> >> This adoption call will run until March 30, 2021 at 2359 UTC. Please indicate
> whether or not you would like to see this I-D adopted as a WG item. Note
> that this is an adoption call for the draft as a starting point for the bundle
> format.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> spt (for the chairs)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wpack mailing list
> >> Wpack@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wpack mailing list
> Wpack@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack