Re: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 01 November 2019 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C46120AEE for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FhwpFThXaxb8 for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B56B120A3E for <wpack@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id t5so10970715ljk.0 for <wpack@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 10:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=13Kcz53PwghyEozlwr4saxOKf2chLHQ4RpAFUl4sTGY=; b=cW5XgNCJnkU5wDnoP+OA43F/Y3Ipfgn3nyQyqAvRL1gcg70Y1eqkfFbSffY5GOARZK EQ/nIsXu1xHSPoXa1pluJ5jAiWMZkgA38pzFpLCxyESEDkKBHhLxCE+Co5e0NlTQLDnP +R/ih3lglqWr/NWeY/p3lYapqELc5/asALxz8lMBEguleQpE4EauFFooQM5rEit5BSpG Y1vN5FbuKjQ0Y/2Ca5mDEH3scszVMutxxAAF9baWwuD2lQm/JZThlv8TOWlGCAFWr/8U t7WVBq+rLIa4djNVr4BRXGc2uNZVLCLMVAQt7kxVue2TmDAfDKv+dyrUSpBtmJQFYQJF LGpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=13Kcz53PwghyEozlwr4saxOKf2chLHQ4RpAFUl4sTGY=; b=DZS/Aqrrvxi9unxftKna9v3lZ2o7LO8I9MWthMRDJ8MKNUDgJrwfWnnoTZs4zYTpFs jZo0rGfrE1+6qSY6+8nGM2fa8TxpTl6PjO6zovuWosiIXHnQ37Lqw3rGxv6ayuDd6i96 xsYLxzgi28fs/IHimmb3S4UglZQnfNVToVprKD5An5qP6zN2C2yKNICH3Qu6WnB0jQHt tTpmgEW8q+QAiK7i5tIk5UPOSJbAeilsIEm/IkDgYR5aSSsPcZXkhTBiMhnOl54t4xWq wjkNGZwLQAZEDE0CJh3xzKBQhCTmh3yMGa7x4x49gc99LMdpf7etrMoLVsJrUZpSnv/+ hSKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZW1LbgtRjaRDKeoEoeERo9I2AkmlYdlU4OVK/Wnh9nMqU7Eux MdmclRjHYje3u5B+XLSJdAwNO4Hy50U326s6CtOqCg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfQbtZ+163WunCgz9LllsaKEZWdHYvWzpEeSG0eXwnlQSLxEATKhc29V/wslA64jLLKA4Jo22x8sG490ReSPk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:10c:: with SMTP id a12mr8922590ljb.93.1572627924606; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 10:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBNmJiwhqEAVz6BUzTVzjm1LS4tRNfpFqG4avs6s03q7mg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNmJiwhqEAVz6BUzTVzjm1LS4tRNfpFqG4avs6s03q7mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 10:04:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNxHVK38d7MdkvPb6XStV25w99GQ0RLODBb0NYNFggbEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: lake@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, wpack@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf6b9c05964bf81a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpack/5r-t27qZQGw2H7KWkzieUBTnKB0>
Subject: Re: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict
X-BeenThere: wpack@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Packaging <wpack.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wpack/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpack@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:05:28 -0000

And proving my point about me missing the big picture, BenK points out to
me that SUIT and ABCD conflict....

I'll refrain from making other suggestions until I know whether other
people are concerned about this.

-Ekr


On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 9:57 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Hi IESG folks,
>
> I regret missing this earlier, but the conflict between LAKE and WPACK
> is really bad. I can think of a whole pile of people who are
> potentially implicated in both (myself, Sean Turner, Richard Barnes,
> Martin Thomson, ...). It would be really great if we could move
> one of these.
>
> I know it's always really hard to make the schedule work and individual
> suggestions always seem to miss the big picture, but what about
> swapping LAKE with SUIT? ISTM that there's a lot less overlap there.
>
> -Ekr
>
>