IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wpack] Web Archives, Replaying Web Pages and WPACK

ehs@pobox.com Mon, 13 July 2020 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ehs@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192B23A0880 for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.38
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.635, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MISSING_MIMEOLE=1.843, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ehs@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aFmt7UQiO1-Y for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0203A087D for <wpack@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45B3E6BAD; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:06:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ehs@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:from:to:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Ko3umyGs0DbcqDrnJ9HZWQ0jf wc=; b=IDQwI+R1nHr0g786EykDWwEwKIt++PDyLnrNYqHDz2Lp17tIxPWNz2nmC tfp5qjQZYabAWsTx7no0SQF2m4LT5knxd+5aPPuv//KsDcl5j+pbwIEl+g8Db6f1 vsal3KXCw/eadZA6Aqpm/s2Pz2bzre2bT8wK7J8lkg+gjDy4Ss=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=date:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:from:to:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=jfHvyujAMMer3MLFIPW 3BWYQWxqVilWEfppbLm0xgnUEA+xbzcNZwOL6d4wLk+kqsazQh0mSvk0kfjiLI9P gVTsZAHQqUzKHjwHaf3zuyNyeJVbUBnlW8TE1XXbdFZ0b9lKUCzz9jEoPgYHqxq+ J5aIspKOz3W8ltJqjDloe6Gk=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCB9E6BAC; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:06:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ehs@pobox.com)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (unknown [173.79.71.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F5FCE6BAB; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:06:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ehs@pobox.com)
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:06:16 -0400
Message-ID: <a67020c2-6b6e-4d00-9a4f-dc4f83cf3f89@email.android.com>
X-Android-Message-ID: <a67020c2-6b6e-4d00-9a4f-dc4f83cf3f89@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <023301d6589e$9b4ead30$d1ec0790$@acm.org>
From: ehs@pobox.com
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: 'Ilya Kreymer' <ikreymer@gmail.com>, wpack@ietf.org
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D464EDCC-C4B5-11EA-A60B-843F439F7C89-07615111!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpack/JIHH-AoUvtmYlwYtLr4ZwLH-Fd4>
Subject: Re: [Wpack] Web Archives, Replaying Web Pages and WPACK
X-BeenThere: wpack@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Packaging <wpack.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wpack/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpack@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 03:06:26 -0000

On Jul 12, 2020 6:48 PM, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> wrote:

Most of the replay of HTTP is irrelevant to the archive use case because there is no point in trying to reach out to original servers long after HTTP/n is obsolete. Mostly it’s a privacy threat to record irrelevant transaction metadta.

Is there a succinct description of the "archive use case"? Provenance is usually pretty important for archives, and the HTTP transaction is quite important information in that regard.

//Ed


v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email