IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wpack] Meeting at IETF 102 in Montreal?

Dan York <york@isoc.org> Sun, 15 July 2018 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <york@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6A8130DCD for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 03:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isoc.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGpcw9IxdlZd for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 03:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0050.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0417A126F72 for <wpack@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 03:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isoc.org; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=v2RiCdbjbphXvqH68tsaBtbe7db8B3PWhO1YMbQbOwg=; b=sk6wRwBKZcIXeOgAUSGmbWKZsPrXgQD7ayJlF6FIlR9qHEv+NQ9KSLa+98ki7BlXrA+ox/QTF0PyKElhw7wuU3qOjgZisr8+s339RuqOSW9KfjVBXM467JIFGmqgtBOyvqPUgMjrBoI52aQCuvr6Yh7+pjzcFVc64XvqeKdzG30=
Received: from DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (20.176.67.31) by DM6PR06MB3929.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (20.176.67.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.952.17; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:04:20 +0000
Received: from DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::21be:7c7c:4650:4416]) by DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::21be:7c7c:4650:4416%5]) with mapi id 15.20.0952.021; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:04:20 +0000
From: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "wpack@ietf.org" <wpack@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Wpack] Meeting at IETF 102 in Montreal?
Thread-Index: AQHT/sRHfpRArEGUqUuv1w5+wf54hKRgfrSAgAj1YwCAAH2eAIAAL28AgAAAmoCAACaYgIAAAHgAgCYADxI=
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:04:20 +0000
Message-ID: <D3A2256C-5F62-46B6-8D89-E1D79490B011@isoc.org>
References: <2BA1FE60-D5A8-49A7-BB92-1650ABB5304B@isoc.org> <CANh-dXnWTwP_m-nwJf4oprS9uwENcRGrsCjJBEKRhUMO=CF7JA@mail.gmail.com> <FA816192-809B-4E13-B88F-7BE426B79EF0@isoc.org> <788BE920-0B52-4B8F-9FA1-26B0C9E7BFC4@mnot.net> <CANh-dXmWX4ZQ+OTx+8-j_2fOBS2LkxQ+6vmMm3B9+BVPJRiKnA@mail.gmail.com> <E60B0F71-4423-464E-ACDF-91985E3D927B@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXt4a+eqz4CtqdCv7tLjrmUTE68vFrEJ-XHS+7JyXzwqQ@mail.gmail.com>, <F0AC3950-C745-4708-A611-B50C7A161290@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <F0AC3950-C745-4708-A611-B50C7A161290@mnot.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=york@isoc.org;
x-originating-ip: [2601:198:4101:7bd5:2082:7c7d:ff5c:2789]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM6PR06MB3929; 7:a424ve7gIuquIaGl/pxEHxPkyv34t5QtNc7jy+m85zo3WKLKcC45MsvgZhHay+r9aPrRdSqFLwYpwu5UZolyrDmIS9KGk6yoM/rhCnU8pufEhNac3JWStyA8y6cvpYczJvO0cRGLUjK84GQ3PUQaWe7AuidlEb7/SDad9IkjiW+9340LBpCm4Coi0bcLXgUzFNrDIgmdNoUFgN+m79/h8C79dPROVAidyffMQcNkbPHtAdl25yevoBgR/qHnMQwr
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2613fc54-e199-47f0-07ff-08d5ea3a558f
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(5600053)(711020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR06MB3929;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR06MB3929:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR06MB3929CF0FEE02646BDADED616B75E0@DM6PR06MB3929.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(31418570063057)(85827821059158);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:DM6PR06MB3929; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM6PR06MB3929;
x-forefront-prvs: 07349BFAD2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(366004)(39830400003)(396003)(136003)(376002)(199004)(189003)(2900100001)(6246003)(53546011)(86362001)(6506007)(102836004)(53936002)(33656002)(83716003)(6116002)(256004)(316002)(93886005)(8676002)(81166006)(53376002)(305945005)(5660300001)(82746002)(97736004)(229853002)(6916009)(76176011)(36756003)(7736002)(81156014)(2906002)(8936002)(476003)(6436002)(966005)(2616005)(6306002)(1720100001)(14454004)(446003)(11346002)(486006)(6512007)(106356001)(46003)(105586002)(478600001)(25786009)(186003)(5250100002)(4326008)(68736007)(6486002)(99286004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR06MB3929; H:DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: kNSs6iTE9Og7MRpkDXu4kVDufFUfEqaW1vKOaOeRr94SngLUDOjZrI7+8tHe7egjVor8K8Gs+RWPb98mPYJZMgXuKoIN/vq3iYWTRlQ7jVQxC5eQr4NciR1ehmrU+C7SgZaLLtHkAt8YPVp8hlu7eglpihAd2stxtlYXgT40gcRoOvTW7BGY8Pa84gNJbW6MnqGwTTAWv57CWsC60ldbb8mlxAgH/m81D2IX6dWKCVJyoRNOGMEjPgsfyJfeojOxIZkd33DgLcvbQmfPsA9CotrRt1bxcDaHSIPmoGeODBkixgC4zw9Rjugb5K81wSz+fqcaBNGvar70L5KAGjj57EUe8T5m3WrUIHWaR12Wmp8=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2613fc54-e199-47f0-07ff-08d5ea3a558f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Jul 2018 10:04:20.5781 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR06MB3929
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpack/K8TPDfFUiG-5NTuBYKD384OYHkg>
Subject: Re: [Wpack] Meeting at IETF 102 in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: wpack@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Packaging <wpack.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wpack/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpack@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:04:26 -0000

Just coming back to this[1]... are there any further suggestions from the group for a time to meet in Montreal?

I am willing to help with logistics. I am also glad to stand up at the HotRFC meeting tonight (IF there is still space) and do a fast “lightning talk” to mention this work and encourage people to join the wpack mailing list and join our side mtg. 

Tuesday lunch does NOT work for me (I am not in SECDIR, but am interested in the GCSC event Olaf Kolkman is promoting.)

What about one of these...

- Monday at 8pm
- Wednesday at 8pm (after plenary)
- Wednesday lunch (conflicts with sponsor lunch speaker)
- Thursday 8am
- Thursday 8pm

Or... anyone else have a suggestion?

Dan

[1] I am in the middle of the chaos of a move of my family from Keene, NH, to the Burlington, VT, area and so I have not been as diligent with reading lists. :-(

--
Dan York
york@isoc.org
+1-802-735-1624
skype:danyork
http://twitter.com/danyork

> On Jun 21, 2018, at 1:46 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 21 Jun 2018, at 3:44 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> That conflicts with SECDIR, which might not be ideal.
> 
> The rule is: if you bring up a conflict, you have to suggest an alternative :)
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email