IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wpack] Problem statement and scope for BoF

"Kaduk, Ben" <bkaduk@akamai.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F2C1206D2 for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30MjIKNoEbZl for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C44C1206C9 for <wpack@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x77IW3Nk007153; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 19:39:34 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=2U1LKIh57uquvI63GUY1GEjuExljoASksAPy/J8oh54=; b=UfL0UOfawx+Nonoc22qmbwJ5M9jPmtoH/FjfcQSbe90D0lqcvZrb5n0D6kkN+ec5myv8 gYbFQTN+aNCJvqt+z1PNUP2ZsSRWMV6Dvu/CW9i8JUHvZ6PBpQecaq8HNv5qOIaWuN9y V0kR/ES6SFcZpCvchVsBzQHDcF0ENh9AbWB3jgyrT3kLiVQG+xDRUVSWjd0tVXv5E2ep 2awbi1CAbIJTE2xt14+A6B4nDKkydnnoF0svF+CDICoEp91bKFwDkTdIiovr3gWZ2SWX FVcutwuLZcnt1dUW9SxG8LTlkQ0vLKBS2xd8Iln9byFx+nezIT0BtVYtutBcdqjFMX9U nQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2u51wv24qn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 07 Aug 2019 19:39:33 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x77IX0Y7021951; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:39:33 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2u5888fhcb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 07 Aug 2019 11:39:33 -0700
Received: from usma1ex-dag3mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.60) by usma1ex-dag3mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:39:32 -0400
Received: from usma1ex-dag3mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.60]) by usma1ex-dag3mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.60]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:39:32 -0400
From: "Kaduk, Ben" <bkaduk@akamai.com>
To: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@mozilla.com>
CC: "wpack@ietf.org" <wpack@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Wpack] Problem statement and scope for BoF
Thread-Index: AQHVS7Y5P2Xfw7nBnUqi+Ma2G0oslqbtdmmAgAK5ggD//65tAIAAZvMA//+P5QA=
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:39:32 +0000
Message-ID: <36092786-D5D9-4BC6-BEC0-7E6E7A7181E4@akamai.com>
References: <CANh-dXkRGGVAzRPC5k8p0u6b7NuidkOt81in70eF3Nwe_BAZQw@mail.gmail.com> <C1E62FBD-28A5-4B1B-8C99-06397919E68C@akamai.com> <CANh-dX=Q6G0ArLhHA6K-DsW87QkgJPNmP25vj05LNcLmZEysJA@mail.gmail.com> <20190807171218.GB19909@akamai.com> <CANh-dXnVOMwsrkRx+ASGu0TwwQ_bTRnnb2BqOqBnSmZeRTW2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANh-dXnVOMwsrkRx+ASGu0TwwQ_bTRnnb2BqOqBnSmZeRTW2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.113.230]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DA0006B560CB8D499BAC3F8BC0E0791F@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-07_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=866 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908070170
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:5.22.84,1.0.8 definitions=2019-08-07_05:2019-08-07,2019-08-07 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=835 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1908070170
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpack/U3FI9_OX_WbQK-dD_QqLz9ir1Go>
Subject: Re: [Wpack] Problem statement and scope for BoF
X-BeenThere: wpack@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Packaging <wpack.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wpack/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpack@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:39:54 -0000

On 8/7/19, 11:21, "Jeffrey Yasskin" <jyasskin@google.com> wrote:
 
>    Ben, do you have any examples of charters that have incorporated this kind of discussion? I'd like to be able to copy the structure if possible.

Unfortunately not; my understanding is that it's been a fairly recent revelation that we should explicitly be thinking about our work in this way.

Sorry,

Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email