Re: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 01 November 2019 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C9E120C2D; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9bSIDLZpjwj; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com (mail-io1-f44.google.com [209.85.166.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63C25120C7D; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 18so11688999ion.6; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P6Ajwk8EpjMmwUX/A2X0yxDQTzAxkEnYD9runROAzhA=; b=W6O8gMK0qdFvqlQ1f5Oie4zTfzRMoTcWO4UnVcT4BJy1Mf1lYDstK7P9USqlcWwBO1 0DhGvYU77Xmk+MtjHeiPSKnWoRnQ48nBLcy/aNIlhP6UEAJ0h6RR3OKkaPBbz92Y/NbI 3oSDvk73u52Be1Jk9io828bJfyLUStKAiBBjbk7g+5dwNpjm1objWavnUEwpyuAo61bm CRU7FmPkxcv9oCseJkApUXF04fwMxgElgWrDadn2tZuQvwoXsZaSZKviDKCZXcT//GE0 10f59y9C1saUllY1ICv5yhGAgOoQ/TPXC+snZMKWFEAp9W8PDT6+NADnUPk+UJKViFZR Ni4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+ZjFU7O1mpiJfvULjC4kw4LYdZB/PFqpoYR0r8HpPXr+76h3P S6F8CnMygGbQdYtNbzOgoKXusEcMFYS1thCM76Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyakGX9mtxwpaLUqVmGdQpa1d5WhSPQqMgZLCXoPiHIndyQZienDB5LWrRx+lQHyVfE2PIDwUxDFCBurMKyODI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c8cd:: with SMTP id y196mr11681611iof.266.1572629307337; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 10:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBNmJiwhqEAVz6BUzTVzjm1LS4tRNfpFqG4avs6s03q7mg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNmJiwhqEAVz6BUzTVzjm1LS4tRNfpFqG4avs6s03q7mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 13:28:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJkd6NUxv-chX=k9=V5S_-pk3COQX12X3qyjaMPvQACEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: lake@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, wpack@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpack/bg2_jzOdXOyFTJ5ItLILpzt5s9I>
Subject: Re: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict
X-BeenThere: wpack@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Packaging <wpack.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wpack/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpack@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:28:30 -0000

We will see what we can do.

Barry

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:58 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi IESG folks,
>
> I regret missing this earlier, but the conflict between LAKE and WPACK
> is really bad. I can think of a whole pile of people who are
> potentially implicated in both (myself, Sean Turner, Richard Barnes,
> Martin Thomson, ...). It would be really great if we could move
> one of these.
>
> I know it's always really hard to make the schedule work and individual
> suggestions always seem to miss the big picture, but what about
> swapping LAKE with SUIT? ISTM that there's a lot less overlap there.
>
> -Ekr
>