Re: [Wpack] Call for adoption of draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-exchanges

[Jeffrey Yasskin <[e-mail]>]

We have an I-D for use cases, at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yasskin-wpack-use-cases-01. I think it's
ready for adoption, at least as a starting point for future work.

Jeffrey

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:41 PM Larry Masinter <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Shouldn't you adopt the use cases first? The scope of activities and the
> "Expected Performance" (section 3) are critical.
> The use cases I had expected that an IETF "Web Packaging" working group to
> work on would include would be the ones that led to mime multipart:
> Multipart/related, multipart/form-data, multipart/alternative,
> multipart/byte-ranges
> Each has its own set of requirements,
>
> --
> https://LarryMasinter.net https://interlisp.org
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wpack <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Sean Turner
> > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 7:52 PM
> > To: Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: WPACK List <[e-mail]>
> > Subject: Re: [Wpack] Call for adoption of draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-
> > exchanges
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > You make a good point about the need for the additional I-Ds, because the
> > charter’s milestones actually call out 3 other I-Ds that address the
> signing
> > mechanism as well as privacy and security. To be blunt, these other I-Ds
> have
> > not yet been submitted. There was some security-related text in the
> bundle
> > document that was removed and Martin Thomson had a content-based
> > origin I-D. I am cautiously optimistic that getting the bundling I-D
> adopted will
> > encourage the other I-Ds to surface because I strongly suspect that
> progress
> > on the bundling I-D is likely to grind to a halt without those I-Ds. I
> do not think
> > that the milestones, which are also a good year out of date at this
> point,
> > should hold us back from adopting the bundling I-D. But, the entire set
> of I-
> > Ds is required- it is the pact we made the IESG to get to done.
> >
> > spt
> >
> > > On Mar 16, 2021, at 00:59, Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Sean,
> > >
> > > I don't have access to minutes of the meeting yet, so this may have
> already
> > been answered --
> > >
> > > The charter says that a use cases document, a privacy analysis
> document,
> > and a security analysis document will be adopted at the same time as the
> > bundling document. What's their status?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > >
> > >> On 16 Mar 2021, at 11:53 am, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Based on interest expressed at IETF 110, this email starts the call
> for
> > adoption of draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-exchanges. The I-D can be found
> > here:
> > >>
> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yasskin-wpack-bundled-
> > exchanges/
> > >>
> > >> This adoption call will run until March 30, 2021 at 2359 UTC. Please
> indicate
> > whether or not you would like to see this I-D adopted as a WG item. Note
> > that this is an adoption call for the draft as a starting point for the
> bundle
> > format.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> spt (for the chairs)
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Wpack mailing list
> > >> [e-mail]
> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wpack mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wpack mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack
>