[wpkops] NIST 800-52
"Ben Wilson" <ben@digicert.com> Tue, 13 May 2014 16:26 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@digicert.com>
X-Original-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33F01A00BC for <wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.506] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SHy3vqUJMF7y for <wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.digicert.com (mail.digicert.com [64.78.193.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13A01A00B2 for <wpkops@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BWILSONL1 (unknown [67.137.52.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digicert.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37E707FA342 for <wpkops@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:49:54 -0600 (MDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=digicert.com; s=mail; t=1399996194; bh=IG4JiZeZtSTpVkQ5kKG0eNjccCecDuq5iSACJJw6das=; h=Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date; b=v6M3VY8v4F3zTYNkz+cQIse2F74PLrbiPnFXbmc1QtE7VwEAuKEpue4i4yk9gacfb EJFbHqLfXQS4E3S2y86puUan4lh4atZYbZ8kFokwJeQ2s2EbVCkamOvwDyWgEFc4AK OepViaicWIg+HNky9YfXe7ar2CvLjwXT+n1cq5f8=
From: Ben Wilson <ben@digicert.com>
To: wpkops@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:49:50 -0600
Organization: DigiCert
Message-ID: <002d01cf6ec2$fa251a00$ee6f4e00$@digicert.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac9uwtDimmUsp6dbQEuIaHOrx737IQ==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01CF6E90.AF0FD4B0"
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpkops/8hiCOJqFqR0GSjJttGhq0q9QA6Y
Subject: [wpkops] NIST 800-52
X-BeenThere: wpkops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ben@digicert.com
List-Id: <wpkops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wpkops/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpkops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:26:15 -0000
I think this is what was mentioned recently - http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-52r1
- [wpkops] NIST 800-52 Ben Wilson
- Re: [wpkops] NIST 800-52 Gary Gapinski