Re: [wpkops] [x500standard] Re: SV: [T17Q11] SV: [pkix] X.509 whitelist proposal

Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@yaanatech.com>
X-Original-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4B91B2DED; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 05:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XrTWRha0s8F; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 05:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from extmail1.yaanatech.com (extmail1.yaanatech.com [63.128.177.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 62B9F1B2DD0; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 05:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-71-171-106-160.clppva.fios.verizon.net [71.171.106.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by extmail1.yaanatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0CA58096; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:28:46 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53CD0726.2050801@yaanatech.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:27:18 -0400
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
Organization: Yaana Technologies
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Erik Andersen <era@x500.eu>, 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <ietf@hallambaker.com>
References: <000b01cfa1bc$b6872ef0$23958cd0$@x500.eu> <53C85314.3040102@yaanatech.com> <003301cfa26b$039c77a0$0ad566e0$@x500.eu> <53C90EC4.1070006@netmagic.com> <002501cfa286$53ffbca0$fbff35e0$@x500.eu> <CAMm+Lwiu+9-p2g7k+rjveH_4J2aGUPjFrcyQeFcC9znp2KZG_g@mail.gmail.com> <003a01cfa294$ab8c1e60$02a45b20$@x500.eu> <53CCE34D.2050403@orange.com> <000701cfa4dd$0a106cd0$1e314670$@x500.eu>
In-Reply-To: <000701cfa4dd$0a106cd0$1e314670$@x500.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpkops/Hm5l1frsnRXbcdJec6_5OoWk8p8
Cc: pkix@ietf.org, wpkops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [wpkops] [x500standard] Re: SV: [T17Q11] SV: [pkix] X.509 whitelist proposal
X-BeenThere: wpkops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.com
List-Id: <wpkops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wpkops/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpkops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:27:21 -0000

Of course,  what Erik didn't tell you is that
the ITU-T still foolishly does not make them
freely available the first year after they are
adopted - in order to extract a few extra Swiss
francs out of the system.

--tony

On 2014-07-21 8:12 AM, Erik Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The X.5xx documents freely available are listed onhttp://www.x500standard.com/index.php?n=Ig.LatestAvail.
>
> The X.5xx documents not freely available are listed onhttp://www.x500standard.com/index.php?n=Ig.Latest.
>
> Erik