IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [wpkops] [T17Q11] SV: [pkix] X.509 whitelist proposal

Olivier Dubuisson <olivier.dubuisson@orange.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <olivier.dubuisson@orange.com>
X-Original-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD741B2D4A; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wda4qyqRm5aB; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (r-mail1.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6431B2D1C; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id F3547DE4003; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:21:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67BEDE4002; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:21:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:21:04 +0200
Received: from [10.193.115.172] ([10.193.115.172]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:21:02 +0200
Message-ID: <53CCE34D.2050403@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:54:21 +0200
From: Olivier Dubuisson <olivier.dubuisson@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <ietf@hallambaker.com>
References: <000b01cfa1bc$b6872ef0$23958cd0$@x500.eu> <53C85314.3040102@yaanatech.com> <003301cfa26b$039c77a0$0ad566e0$@x500.eu> <53C90EC4.1070006@netmagic.com> <002501cfa286$53ffbca0$fbff35e0$@x500.eu> <CAMm+Lwiu+9-p2g7k+rjveH_4J2aGUPjFrcyQeFcC9znp2KZG_g@mail.gmail.com> <003a01cfa294$ab8c1e60$02a45b20$@x500.eu>
In-Reply-To: <003a01cfa294$ab8c1e60$02a45b20$@x500.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2014 10:21:04.0046 (UTC) FILETIME=[7A14ACE0:01CFA4CD]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpkops/k13bgABmCRjJOhLDK8Ifg1e_WBU
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:53:58 -0700
Cc: 'SG17-Q11' <T13sg17q11@lists.itu.int>, pkix@ietf.org, wpkops@ietf.org, 'Directory list' <x500standard@freelists.org>
Subject: Re: [wpkops] [T17Q11] SV: [pkix] X.509 whitelist proposal
X-BeenThere: wpkops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <wpkops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wpkops/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpkops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:21:07 -0000

ITU-T Recommendations are free and ASN.1 has been freely available for 
many years.

O. Dubuisson

On 18/07/2014 16:29, Erik Andersen wrote:
> If it is the first then I can't see any likelihood that an ITU publication would help in the slightest. The mainstream IT industry is adamant that communications standards have to be open standards. And paying for a standard completely kills it dead. So does use of ASN.1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email