Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX

Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@ssf-sys.dhl.com> Thu, 24 February 1994 22:29 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13705; 24 Feb 94 17:29 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13699; 24 Feb 94 17:29 EST
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20531; 24 Feb 94 17:29 EST
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP) id <09599-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Thu, 24 Feb 1994 16:20:32 +0000
Received: from gateway2.DHL.COM by cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 24 Feb 94 16:20:26 -0600
Received: from maverick.ssf-sys.DHL.COM by gateway2.DHL.COM id aa12602; 24 Feb 94 14:20 PST
Received: by maverick.ssf-sys.DHL.COM (DHLGMS 4.03-DSI) id AA02740; Thu, 24 Feb 94 14:22:21 -0800
Message-Id: <9402242222.AA02740@maverick.ssf-sys.DHL.COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 1994 14:22:21 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Russ Wright <wright@lbl.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@ssf-sys.dhl.com>
Subject: Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX
Cc: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu, cxii@es.net
X-Mailer: <PC Eudora Version 2.0>

Thought I'd cut down on the chatter and get to the point..:-) Comments on 
">>" section below anyone?

>Good idea, you should suggest it to the list (I don't want to steal your idea).
>
>
>Russ
>
>>Appologies for my two cents that obviously just added to the quagmire. If
>>there hasn't been a search done already for INTX, might do a couple of other
>>simplistic alternatives to cut down the multiple requests - IX, MX, IX4 ??


Cheers!

[ psr ]