Re: using DNS for rfc1327 mapping rules, new I-D summary
Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr> Mon, 11 October 1993 12:52 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21524;
11 Oct 93 8:52 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21520;
11 Oct 93 8:52 EDT
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19242;
11 Oct 93 8:52 EDT
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP)
id <26391-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Mon, 11 Oct 1993 07:37:20 +0000
Received: from mitsou.inria.fr by cs.wisc.edu; Mon, 11 Oct 93 07:37:09 -0500
Received: by mitsou.inria.fr (5.65c8/IDA-1.2.8) id AA06861;
Mon, 11 Oct 1993 13:38:26 +0100
Message-Id: <199310111238.AA06861@mitsou.inria.fr>
To: Claudio.Allocchio@elettra.trieste.it
Cc: IETF-OSI-X400OPS@cs.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: using DNS for rfc1327 mapping rules, new I-D summary
In-Reply-To: Your message of "11 Oct 93 11:49:12 GMT." <74742111013991/726597
INFN>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 93 13:38:24 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
Claudio, Your draft is fine, but the use of the same syntax with two different meanings is quite confusing: >*.inria.fr. IN XA 10 inria.fr#PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.C-fr > >on the other way... > >*.PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.C-fr.X400.fr. IN XA 10 PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.C-fr#inria.fr > >or better (C-fr is just redundant!) > >*.PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.X400.fr. IN XA 10 PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.C-fr#inria.fr I would suggest that you either use: PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.X400.fr. IN PTR inria.fr or *.PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.X400.fr. IN XA 10 inria.fr#PRMD-inria.ADMD-red.C-fr In fact, I see why you would like to use the XA record -- having a "catch all" is nice. Christian Huitema
- using DNS for rfc1327 mapping rules, new I-D summ… ALLOCCHIO
- Re: using DNS for rfc1327 mapping rules, new I-D … Christian Huitema
- Re: using DNS for rfc1327 mapping rules, new I-D … Claudio Allocchio - +39 40 3758523