Re: Draft Agenda for Houston
Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com> Tue, 26 October 1993 18:18 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11928;
26 Oct 93 14:18 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11924;
26 Oct 93 14:18 EDT
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22249;
26 Oct 93 14:18 EDT
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP)
id <05526-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Tue, 26 Oct 1993 10:05:29 +0000
Received: from ics.uci.edu by cs.wisc.edu; Tue, 26 Oct 93 10:05:24 -0500
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id ac22991; 26 Oct 93 8:00 PDT
Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa05374; 26 Oct 93 7:58 PDT
To: Alan.Young@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch
Cc: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: Draft Agenda for Houston
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue,
26 Oct 1993 08:53:01 BST." <27256.751621981@zh014.ubs.ubs.ch>
Reply-To: Stef@nma.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1993 07:58:07 -0700
Message-Id: <5372.751647487@odin.nma.com>
X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com
There is a very common fallacy that since most traffic (80-90%) is local/internal, that the quality of external service is unimportant. But, this ratio almost always holds, so we have to ask how important external traffic is, regardless of its percentage of the total. Just ask one simply question: Since only 10-20% of a company's phone calls are external, why not save a lot of money by disconnecting the external trunk lines? The answer is of course obvious! When the external trunks are cut, the reason for the company being in business is threatened. So this point needs to be made in the argument for improvement of the quality of external EMail service. But, this is really just beating around the edges of my logic here. My point is not that some people just are not logical, or that they may even be stupid, which is often enough true. I want to make a more important point, which so many people miss when considering how things work in the Internet. In the Internet, each end brings a certain quality to any connecton across the net. The quality of that connection depends on the quality provided by both ends. The quality of the connection is not controlled by some carrier service provider in between. Especially in terms of the EMail gateway behavior on either end. The quality of service is determined by the two ends, not the middle, as many people think. They are just thinking in terms of PTT Style Message Services, and are simply not aware of their own end responsibilities. I often find (from running many mailing lists) that there are sites where the users are convinced that the entire Internet is a rotten low quality service, when in fact, it was all due to their own local EMail gateway service. They could only see the Internet through their own rotten service on their end. Tehy cannot usefully excahnage EMail with anyone. This is the major point to get across, that any end can only expect to get as good as they give. It is like the problems of quality control on your plain paper copier. If you accept poor quality, and do not call for service, you will come to believe that all copiers must be bad, and that you cannot expect anything better. Well, it only depends on whether or not you call for service when the quality is below your stadnards, so the quality of your service shows more about where you have set your standards, than anything else. Speaking figuratively, if you are not smart enough to call for better service, then you deserve what you get. Cheers...\Stef
- Draft Agenda for Houston Tony Genovese
- Re: Draft Agenda for Houston pays
- Re: Draft Agenda for Houston Einar Stefferud
- Re: Draft Agenda for Houston Alan.Young
- Re: Draft Agenda for Houston Einar Stefferud