Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX
Ola Johansson <Ola.Johansson@tip.net> Thu, 24 February 1994 11:55 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01192; 24 Feb 94 6:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01188; 24 Feb 94 6:55 EST
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03948; 24 Feb 94 6:55 EST
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP) id <08533-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Thu, 24 Feb 1994 05:41:33 +0000
Received: from netman.tip.net by cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 24 Feb 94 05:41:28 -0600
Received: from paddan (paddan.tip.net) by netman.tip.net (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06269; Thu, 24 Feb 94 12:43:06 +0100
Message-Id: <9402241143.AA06269@netman.tip.net>
X-Sender: ojn@netman.tip.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 1994 12:41:39 +0100
To: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu, cxii@es.net
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ola Johansson <Ola.Johansson@tip.net>
Subject: Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX
Cc: bal@tip.net, eon@tip.net, hh@tip.net
X-Mailer: <PC Eudora Version 1.4>
At 04:53 PM 94/2/23, Allan Cargille wrote: /../ >Stef has the report that CNRI completed. If people do not like INTX, >we can discuss other possible names. /../ >Once we agree on the ADMD name, the UW will register the ADMD at ANSI. > >Opinions, anyone? Please read the following for what it is; "opinions" from "anyone", i.e. my humble self... (addresses used below are semi-fictional) INTX as the admd is as good as any other, however maybe INTERNET could be better? Unfortunately there is a company called INTERNET (yes, really!), so maybe an admd with that name is prohibited. Is INTX intended to be used by any x.400 admd operator as a virtual admd address, and in that case; how many operators are willing (and/or able) to implement this "virtual" admd to point to a (rfc-1327 compliant?) x.400/rfc-822 gateway? Anyway, I think that this admd=INTX could be registered as a virtual admd *without* any country code. Is that possible? By doing so, the country code in the x.400 address could be used for indicating the top domain in the rfc-822 address, like this: unisource.se ----------------------------+ ! ! +-------------------+ ! ! ! \/ \/ p=unisource; a=INTX; c=se Mail that is addressed in the other direction could be mapped in the same fashion, and with an exact one-to-one relationship between the rfc-822 and the x.400 address: g=ola; s=johansson; o=tech-dev; p=ubn; a=INTX; c=net ! ! ! ! ! ! +-----+ +----+ +-+ +--------+ ! ! ! ! ! +----------+ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ ola.johansson@tech-dev.ubn.net I realize that we have a problem when any of the address fields contains a space character, but that could either be solved using a smart mapping in the gateway or by using the more general rfc-1327 addressing: "/g=ola/s=johansson/o=tech dev/p=ubn/a=INTX/c=net/"@x400gateway.se But the smoothest way around this would be to either allow space in rfc-822 addresses or to not allow them in x.400 addresses...? //Ola * *** Ola Johansson, Unisource Business Networks, P O Box 10135 **** S-121 28 Stockholm, SWEDEN, email: <Ola.Johansson@tip.net> *** phone +46-8-688 2156, fax +46-8-688 2008 *
- need a new name for ADMD=IMX Allan Cargille
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Paul Rarey
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Tony Genovese
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Ola Johansson
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Paul Rarey
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Russ Wright
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Paul Rarey
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Einar Stefferud
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Einar Stefferud
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Paul.Rarey
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX John C Klensin
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Bernt Allonen
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Paul.Rarey
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX MIKE STEIN 202-260-7444
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Allan Cargille
- Re: need a new name for ADMD=IMX Bernt Allonen