Re: The role of media types for XML content
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> Wed, 15 June 2005 23:35 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5FNZCu7013862; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:35:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j5FNZC4G013861; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail1.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.197]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5FNZ8eO013837 for <ietf-xml-mime@imc.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:35:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (r113192.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [210.167.113.192]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4F51C84E; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:35:05 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:35:09 +0900
From: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Subject: Re: The role of media types for XML content
Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org
In-Reply-To: <11810060563.20050615203116@w3.org>
References: <20050616030956.7580.MURATA@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> <11810060563.20050615203116@w3.org>
X-Mailer-Plugin: BkASPil for Becky!2 Ver.2.046
Message-Id: <20050616082827.6AEE.MURATA@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.20.04 [ja]
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-xml-mime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Chris> With respect, you are, since I pointed one out in this thread. You may Chris> disagree with it, but you are not unaware of it. I have already Chris> mentioned content negotiation of schemas and the problems caused by Chris> serving both RNG and XSD as application/xml. Yes, of course. You pointed out the problem. Chris, Mark, and Martin think that an attribute indicating media types is very useful for standalone schemas and are inclined to forget embedded schemas for now. I think that an attribute specifying primary namespaces, for example, is more useful and it works for standalone schemas as well as embedded schemas. I also think that the use of media types by the referrer should be avoided, since they may be different from what the server says. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Chris Lilley
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Chris Lilley
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Chris Lilley
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Mark Baker
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Liam Quin
- Re: The role of media types for XML content John.Cowan
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Martin Duerst
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Liam Quin
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Chris Lilley
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Mark Baker
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto
- Re: The role of media types for XML content Mark Baker
- Re: The role of media types for XML content MURATA Makoto