Re: Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml

Bjoern Hoehrmann <> Fri, 11 May 2012 01:22 UTC

Received: from (localhost []) by (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4B1MD0t073554 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 May 2012 18:22:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by (8.14.5/8.13.5/Submit) id q4B1MDPH073553; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:22:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
X-Authentication-Warning: majordom set sender to using -f
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.3) with SMTP id q4B1MC7q073547 for <>; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:22:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 May 2012 01:22:10 -0000
Received: from (EHLO HIVE) [] by (mp030) with SMTP; 11 May 2012 03:22:10 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19P2ecqCWZPPVSkFqvI9OpAogpaBUxt+InFhfEq/9 3HNqoCH3zGwaGB
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <>
To: Kazuyuki Ashimura <>
Subject: Re: Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 03:22:10 +0200
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <>
List-ID: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>

* Kazuyuki Ashimura wrote:
>W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup
>Language (EmotionML)" at:
>I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on
>the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the
>procedure defined at:

The procedure requires Working Groups to ask for ietf-types review when
making a Last Call announcement. I have not been able to find any such
request in the archive. If the Working Group failed to follow the pro-
cedure, it would be helpful if you could put that on the record.

>MIME media type name:
>     application

This is using an outdated template. The current one is in RFC 4288. In
it, some field names are different and some fields are organized in a
different manner.

>Optional parameters:
>     charset
>         This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter 
>of the application/xml media type as specified in [RFC3023] or its 
>Encoding considerations:
>     By virtue of EmotionML content being XML, it has the same 
>considerations when sent as "application/emotionml+xml" as does XML. See 
>RFC 3023 (or its successor), section 3.2.

RFC 3023 has boilerplate for this, but the above seems close enough.
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 ·
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 ·