IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The role of media types for XML content

Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> Wed, 15 June 2005 16:05 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5FG5CFQ002108; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:05:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j5FG5CSk002107; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from homer.w3.org ([128.30.52.30]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5FG5B38002080 for <ietf-xml-mime@imc.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:05:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from liam@w3.org)
Received: by homer.w3.org (Postfix, from userid 16040) id D46024F128; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:05:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:05:08 -0400
From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
To: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Cc: ietf-xml-mime@imc.org
Subject: Re: The role of media types for XML content
Message-ID: <20050615160508.GM1742@w3.org>
References: <20050615075541.6960.MURATA@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> <20050614235947.GL1742@w3.org> <20050615092439.6964.MURATA@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050615092439.6964.MURATA@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
X-Feet: bare, comfortable. happy and free!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-xml-mime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:45:04AM +0900, MURATA Makoto wrote:
> Liam> I'd like to see a registration for the XML syntax simply because
> Liam> it's useful today, despite the limitations.
> 
> Then, why doesn't W3C register specialized media types for XSLT or 
> W3C XML Schema?  Is there some consensus in W3C?

XSLT - I think application/xslt+xml is either registered or the
registration will be sent here for XSLT 2.  I don't know the status
for Schema offhand -- we're getting better, slowly :-)

> Anyway, we can do nothing about a specialized media type for the RNG 
> XML syntax by November.
Understood.  Thanks for the reply.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email