Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] contact element

You’re still incredibly fast with your replies! 

> On May 10, 2021, at 1:30 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
> That's a lot of contacts. :-)
> 
> Do we even have contact information for everyone who submitted position
> papers?

No, but we don’t necessarily have contact info for the individuals listed in the other sections either.
That said, I’m thinking that not using <contact> here makes sense in that a reader could go to the relevant reference and get the info from the paper directly.  One problem with this approach might be if we need to use <contact> for names with non-ASCII characters.  Based on my quick spot check, I don’t think this is problematic for this document; the names seem to match what appears in the docs.  RFC 8980 included Stéphane Bortzmeyer, Moritz Müller, and Jörg Ott. 

Does it make sense to use <contact> in this section only for the names that contain non-ASCII chars?  Is it problematic that use of <contact> would be inconsistent? 

Thanks!
Sandy 

> The other sections make sense to me, but I'm not sure about
> position paper authors. However, we do have precedent...
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 5/10/21 2:25 PM, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> 
>> I could use some practical input regarding <contact> and the “minimal
>> XML profile".  In draft-iab-covid19-workshop
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-covid19-workshop-03>,
>> we would add <contact> in the following sections:
>> 
>> Workshop participants
>> Program Committee
>> Acknowledgments
>> 
>> Should the RPC also add them for individuals listed under Position
>> Papers
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-covid19-workshop-03#section-5>,
>> as we did for RFC 8980
>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8980.html#section-3>?  I'm trying to
>> understand where to draw the line here.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sandy 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 30, 2021, at 11:47 PM, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com
>>> <mailto:sginoza@amsl.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Perfect - thanks!
>>> Have a great weekend!
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 29, 2021, at 4:16 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com
>>>> <mailto:stpeter@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> No worries, I had about 20 action items fall off my radar! :-)
>>>> 
>>>> BTW, I added this to the agenda for Monday:
>>>> 
>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/5mDrCP5fU3lG5-ug5PL0QviQdcU/
>>>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/5mDrCP5fU3lG5-ug5PL0QviQdcU/>
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/29/21 5:14 PM, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
>>>>> I was just replying to this as well.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry, this fell off my radar.  We’ll work on it!
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 29, 2021, at 4:08 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> TODO: Sandy and John to write up guidance.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ###
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Did you two ever get a chance to write this up?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not yet.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
>>>>>> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
>>>>>> https://jl.ly
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Xml-sg-cmt mailing list
>>>>>> Xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Xml-sg-cmt mailing list
>>>> Xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Xml-sg-cmt mailing list
>>> Xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org <mailto:Xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt
>> 
> 