IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc-dev] progressing RFC 7991 (and friends)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 05 June 2020 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EB93A0B08 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 05:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCTQnn0A9yOO for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 05:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 819863A0B07 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 05:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.112] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49dj1y5NzzzyYN; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:41:26 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <8fd7f1ba-96a7-e3fa-29a6-32fe47b5cad5@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 14:41:26 +0200
Cc: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 613053686.29732-8a829f307bf1c58ccf1b71f3225a358a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1DF69700-3713-40B8-9A70-818F69483733@tzi.org>
References: <8fd7f1ba-96a7-e3fa-29a6-32fe47b5cad5@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/2DmHK5oYR-kwpRYI3n4zigbQjeQ>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] progressing RFC 7991 (and friends)
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:41:33 -0000

Hi Julian,

what is the decision process (who are the WG chairs)?

On 2020-06-05, at 13:14, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Plain text diffs compared to the latest published draft are over here:
> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-rfc7991bis-latest-from-previous.diff.html>.

To enable starting to work on this, a diff from RFC 7991 itself would be useful.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email