IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 10 May 2019 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8069012016D for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 08:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gHAHFqZQN8h3 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 08:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E976B120139 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 08:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1557503164; bh=G035KAwjcB8BJOs9PE5Sh1mYTCtfBLWlXJL20Rf/Sms=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cyX9RivWqEm7d+vx9aA24el/i+d4fRttU+YSN9K5wFYLNAUEpfmZXdKkHbPL3vbLk eX4HO0DD8a2uIX3hpawTq40xdKI2TZjz7KF8BDTsgBgfDvdMIjrkaaOfV42e30fRWx 53dNxH07mQ8gi5FtNf7mazucyRVTmG0Q9Z7zZCsc=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.148.236]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LyB6P-1gbIRV1GFR-015WyG; Fri, 10 May 2019 17:46:04 +0200
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, XML Developer List <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
References: <eb78385f-9ac0-01e8-8b4a-572d8890c1a1@greenbytes.de> <19522381-3529-e66e-adb4-3a1c7d5ee9ea@gmx.de> <e8791b44-738a-9ebe-946e-4b02a6635dc2@levkowetz.com> <df6742ec-d60b-0835-ad87-a297531a2771@gmx.de> <4fe5ca5e-4fbf-6ca8-36c7-1d1b93dfc07a@levkowetz.com> <fe699579-d33f-44ca-9d14-f3d99223392b@gmx.de> <a8b0cca7-4bfd-df14-c30e-fdf8bedcab90@levkowetz.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <10473b16-04b7-7c48-cd29-fbd5d3e15ee8@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:46:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a8b0cca7-4bfd-df14-c30e-fdf8bedcab90@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:yR8Zy7M/goWTLEtJ+po1RhgqZ8OBE3XvO1V0alrkF6MMOF8fqBU 1cn6pnPy3uSPJjqn8g5NFGWaptVG2Md97XjxM9x6DkbMeHW1d/nooMvejCuUdmP3IFMja6w +n84DmvEeWQ6jIf2oCwg2JhVZ3X7V/xfqR2L0+lkLg0bgIqqcnRqlZzgoukTijTNL7Oco61 TQdhJCEjE/e5ciPJR+oVA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vwcqOenX9pk=:b3JsJsT1UUIdvrrDcNMHG6 og3Gc6nswxTb7E3LaqCLsKD9wehnx9XHCP3nxpRE6gSy5aYWrp0HYb9hbRv7XttB4liiTJdaJ gjoKqZuQbfAYoWOsimjuJZgTfpXVDJGPXU5vW2zSpYr9MxKwERq+16fQa7oAB1IMu8QOn7Dr5 kq9JP7EKcFnTNBFWSZuIrsJ1rPxBF77tVxX6eWCegNlIQ+MqcvSBr5XfFpp8maCLDptud7TIv iMUkLkft760qVc5cCuyoZ3vHJghSHVkVbAUfALcu8Wa34ZldXXJFFsPUPbCssBcGc9LEZ3n1s Uet57j0306o3lehuOmWfdsSFSh/RSaW+oYpXdN3jW2D/90mf/cUg8ujVb/5QXA27UobmIqehd eCffV4LFmZeb3P219Uyxe/7WYboXnsz+3XzIq9QsrKFw0ac3+zc0T+XHd82DOdrrh6dpayaSH tyFVq37iySJ3zU6zEZ/CnqxgIZQG0MPqpEhL2XYLm33G8tqnk7gJrN4s+HL/PtRzVw0Rxuewi 7aJyyEHko/5BitRhnGGdXCnuKYDoHkav7EZiwz9h5cV9FZA6L8Vl12Vd0E9oUUGxbkiw30Imw lvne90VEERqscGvKqrcMNZfuRJ6FGhzTAk5s9XP+Gx0vQ+aNj+M+6vnefiLN/H4X7NDE8CE5G ZDYjh56B27YjfEvWtXTKW2z+tIeTXnQA84u+omPoGn3FENYGqprkLU0xtLs/DrkPpPicAi7qu txMQUkC6epp+o+MnU5pwnha7527dnaGYEk93rDo5F6NwwHFQ9/XAmBIuCf9eslBS7DfpIGyum yntY8ZOQIw7MxhCJ8uJ6+nxUy5XeFKH30MbNF41jQy/r4OAWnGzFpEscER/l2Rav0u9WORGmH sLRhFbQD+GQ1zqEMkbLDl3friUzs4s+YD+RbDYnIFGOcg4WRAh/Q5tFfSaJV+FyhVKr/D3Lyz +niphz8Wg9g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/3tEKjDtckkJnAVGI6h-3hdFL1B8>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:46:48 -0000

On 10.05.2019 12:00, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-05-10 11:38, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 10.05.2019 11:25, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> Yes. What makes you think it's not?
>>>
>>> When did v2 get support for handling both a 'src' attribute and textual
>>> content in <artwork>?
>>> ...
>>
>> For at least ten years, I'd say.
>>
>> Excerpt from rfc5598.xml, dated July 2009:
>>
>>>          <artwork
>>>          align="center"
>>>          alt="[ User, MHS, User Service Model ]"
>>>          name="Basic Internet Mail Service Model"
>>>          src="email-arch-fig-svcmodel.png"
>>>          type="image/png">
>>> <![CDATA[
>>>                                 +--------+
>>>              ++================>|  User  |
>>>              ||                 +--------+
>>>              ||                      ^
>>> +--------+  ||          +--------+  .
>>> |  User  +==++=========>|  User  |  .
>>> +---+----+  ||          +--------+  .
>>>      .       ||               ^      .
>>>      .       ||   +--------+  .      .
>>>      .       ++==>|  User  |  .      .
>>>      .            +--------+  .      .
>>>      .                 ^      .      .
>>>      .                 .      .      .
>>>      V                 .      .      .
>>> +---+-----------------+------+------+---+
>>> |   .                 .      .      .   |
>>> |   .................>.      .      .   |
>>> |   .                        .      .   |
>>> |   ........................>.      .   |
>>> |   .                               .   |
>>> |   ...............................>.   |
>>> |                                       |
>>> |     Message Handling Service (MHS)    |
>>> +---------------------------------------+
>
> And what was the v2 handling of this?

If by "v2" you refer to the spec, the answer is over here:
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7749.html#element.artwork>.

But if you refer to the v2 impl (Python-based), as opposed to the
original TCL implementation: I don't know. That RFC was produced with
the old tool. But just because the rewritten tool failed to implement
that doesn't make the syntax suddenly invalid.

Best regards, Julian

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email