Re: [xml2rfc-dev] Please help review v3 files

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Thu, 18 July 2019 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199DE120830 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjoGf2A_rqKV for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367C6120822 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.10.104] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE6662FE82; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:12:57 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1563466378; bh=xnO92jRddBQ/cxZ6rJtVtoOzliWmBrnuzzHfX0SkENM=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=AQPungYPsZG6AWDMpibHfyrRszHLjX1a8xxfNecdiMnYaZ8Y+b3eYMEJjZNReurgr WDIpit6s355wSe0+bdzBlVb+poIiPEM6h4N0bDgs9VDSwPAnhppBtpFayvQKuxUffB 7Z1TS/Uob9SJPJJVzE3TGFztc29BVkhINEaE70nhxpaHjZ/rE27KABZV+O9k1fhWMm 9jxGL9yLxKWc9Y52MwNwFDQZw/DKH610qZ7YVxrliXMZNULH2mG53f9ZhjtpLnvGxo N1T7mqGaqstdQQGeGxNhVDagWdgtbirEkdNlKQmIzjrzECqhJm5c22vr6egbFw698Q EJRRBpfTeWaHg==
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Message-Id: <F8253878-D8A8-4DCF-94D5-769CD40E7813@bangj.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC989390-75BE-401C-A946-F2B1963F4607"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3566.0.1\))
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:12:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3FA7D490-1D84-4E70-B3D0-997F3AF4F2C5@tzi.org>
Cc: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <62908E23-2FC0-4ED7-84B2-E86454020206@amsl.com> <3FA7D490-1D84-4E70-B3D0-997F3AF4F2C5@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3566.0.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/8NWyQnt1IqG6_niuTtG01jjw2Tw>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] Please help review v3 files
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:13:04 -0000

I have commented before that I think it’s a bad idea to have the table of contents scroll separately in the html output. I think the table of contents should just flow down the page. Multiple scroll bars are really hard for accessibility.

Tom

> On Jul 18, 2019, at 3:23 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> The HTML form has an intrusive tablet of contents that is hiding a third of each line, is hard to get rid of, and that reappears on the slightest scrolling.  The page is essentially unusable.  (Viewed on an iPhone)
> 
> Sent from mobile
> 
> On 18. Jul 2019, at 08:19, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com <mailto:sginoza@amsl.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> As you know, the transition to XMLv3 is quickly approaching.  As part of our preparation, the RPC is  converting some XMLv2 files to XMLv3.  We’re hoping some of you will take the time to review the files and provide feedback regarding whether the updates are as expected and the XMLv3 files are considered “good” v3 files.  
>> 
>> A couple of notes:
>> - we focused on format only; we did not make editorial updates. 
>> - the diff files compare the initial v2v3 output with the files we edited.
>> 
>> Please review the following files:
>> 
>> 1) draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11.txt <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11.txt>
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3.html>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3.pdf <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3.pdf>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3.txt>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3..xml <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3.xml>
>> 
>> rfc-xmldiff:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3-xmldiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3-xmldiff.html>
>> 
>> htmlwdiff:
>> file:///Volumes/rfcpa/inc-work/v3test/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11-MS.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html
>> 
>> 
>> 2) draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07.txt <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07.txt>
>> 
>> Please pay particular attention to lists and the use of <aside>.  We experimented with list styles and used <aside> for notes.  Using <aside> in this way required some changes because <aside> can’t be used within lists.  
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.html>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.pdf <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.pdf>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.txt>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.xml <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.v2v3.xml>
>> 
>> rfc-xmldiff:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.orignal.v2v3-xmldiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.orignal.v2v3-xmldiff.html>
>> 
>> htmlwdiff:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.orignal.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07-SG.orignal.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html>
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks for your help!
>> Sandy
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> xml2rfc-dev mailing list
>> xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev <https://www.ietf..org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc-dev mailing list
> xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev