Re: [xml2rfc-dev] docName?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 10 May 2019 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B44C1200CC for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 05:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pfJMamR9YSjb for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 05:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6F5120006 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 05:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1557490808; bh=b32ow+0zlRrMzIMicUOhh6jMnWIWvxS1bBi97T377fw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ObypFw91G+Lwr4lJSGNmurze47moNSQnQhex6Yc583v8sq1Q2POa6MELMsqHJcLYY 74XrDoBT5N1k/Uibmw0gPYlxbmBYpaHwWY0nO2xGLVgm04c7ta2L+N+RSkmykxhOoe 7G+hnZKlk7Hk7sGDhGXDHjlqCdTgSl9GtQ1QTXGE=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.148.236]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Ml6mE-1gzrcq0DAC-00lTMF; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:20:08 +0200
To: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: XML Developer List <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
References: <20190408214850.fbwdzhza7g4omyvs@miek.nl> <c49cafe0-37d7-8f32-7056-d37df808d96f@gmx.de> <20190509060348.77yjfr3uuff7e67j@miek.nl> <9f6f2abd-5cda-2611-b1e6-4e912a17f5bb@levkowetz.com> <20190510065425.iy74lntsbeeakjeg@miek.nl> <a96215de-8228-e9b4-2ee7-f64c73eaace8@gmx.de> <98223d05-21ec-e914-046d-30c9dcb0a695@levkowetz.com> <20190510120244.dl2sg3qopbb4qd4b@miek.nl>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <6dad1367-79f2-7dc0-3304-a8724dda0807@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:20:06 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190510120244.dl2sg3qopbb4qd4b@miek.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:b+rQyrPvPY3+Jsycrpr9JHD6uCi534XMhzRXYOAU/acKQJov3xw wH/332vwYjWk0QsGMI7Z03DI1PkJkzfr+OJyHW4mv2G/n9VbqLrVmaaH+8ggqLmPtpzp3Sh CNEWvUaF+TodNUTKDvSb1cH5B8cDl3u9ZbjFdpJMoPoDtDv15ICU4eQAxJBkuAjIo69+p0W Arc2xR3vUtNOZBC2QUeXw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:TviF2yYbZuc=:eGF9ZnWESerh//h5VWs832 o6r5ofaWoU+bOAJUvgbrszYJwtuk2jSltnDuSZJaQ9gdB00GOBdfudY9Pi6cimvuDNpozOY26 3LygEP/MXEGiQwcWp8c/ZRX5zAVbU+2ckEhEVu4JYC+D1fiYhZuVrUldQYdk24ISYY1EYsKee bsdjJbmPD1bnUFjRLKr0wyjWKRE5QlO8XEScV04yKeAzg41uA+PFs2x6T35rScOARzlcR55PM SiWKmhIXhkdpBiT1HzntEDHLhtSpldDz6OAZNzte8biJ001mzlUwewPSuM7soEUTM9IhKUFkc X/4PbeaPMRS+QzYhRd9dVC4jcksO6HwhYx5ZS/7Xl58hl38raC6Awz+tGfS+VLqCdywPh/WvM kZmytRTyt7ifpCAXNO6+oWue296ryQmcDp0kh9jEe1h6/9t3xJoOcwdAr1ZW4kDUEJF0H+nQF zpguJC9Q1h5z5o4vU+C2UAzaNF5MTt2hBngO/GfmhdFHwguQy1LBrogdKTn668sJjEoWV/bqa iFlDnWp0R69ntV0T9CoBYdcZJd8Xqa5hi7WF6o6Bgs9lzj2zz4sxVCScmYO74bu/pUz2FxtN+ C+iwk1NLiGi7UB+ZyGKG7LKjyNnn5eZCmBdYw1cmsvHANPYGrnVIzUS8v1qav6EXlIuj0tnE9 WXbklPKC3xc4JBZLEddgo71W5dE7NO3s4V9Tv1fzEUz8qcaHkASZet22G0s1D0U4D0Lk6GyRL sOFvlBrfw03EgZBddeayo+xXoXw72cGTMcEk0+UdE4VkfcN5lYISi5NyE0mT5hIS9QNIngwGa PuQFYrIaGU5ygUIauT+abmpGq1Z3BIRiG1uY7f+D93oN4qJ/RuJtQg4XQps8b00lIxQdAY3Sd C9M6RusXIUq0pKCO9+xpUbeQEiXMKpvtsVEKCZwuxoN6vqZEZfADziLQzuU5Vdz8S7ltDQaDd 1CIgJ9d4OeQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/B9HcVVKALzuzYK-BtluS0MuO808>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] docName?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 12:20:28 -0000

On 10.05.2019 14:02, Miek Gieben wrote:
> [ Quoting <henrik@levkowetz.com> in "Re: [xml2rfc-dev] docName?..." ]
>> No, the docName should not change to a number; the docName is used to add
>> metadata about the draft from which an RFC is derived when writing a v3
>> RFC in html format, and to insert the draft name when writing draft
>> output.
>>
>>>> Also because there is a number attribute
>>>> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7991#section-2.45.7), which I added
>>>> eons
>>>> ago because xml2rfc complained; maybe that can be removed now (because
>>>> its deprecated) ?
>>
>> No, as Julian indicates, follow 7749 with respect to metadata.  The
>> number
>> still indicates which RFC number is to be generated.
>>
>>     Henrik
>
> Ok, thanks for the info; I'll make those changes.
>
> One more question if you have docName will xml2rfc; will this work as well:
>
> Warning: Expected a <link> with rel='prev' providing the datatracker url
> for the origin draft.

FWIW, that's a requirement that doesn't make any sense at all - I would
ignore the warning for now.

Best regards, Julian