Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.12, <br>

[Heather Flanagan <[e-mail]>]

On 10/6/18 6:04 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> Hi Heather,
>
> On 2018-10-06 01:13, Heather Flanagan wrote:
>> Hola a todos!
>>
>> Apologies for letting this thread get a bit out of hand. Airplanes and
>> small, on-site meetings are not conducive to handling active threads.
>>
>> This isn't an IETF WG, but we're going to work along those models for
>> sake of clarity. Consider me the WG chair for the purpose of consensus
>> calls and breaking deadlock decisions.
> Thank you.  Much appreciated :-)  And good to have a decision on issue #37.
>
> Will you be summarizing where we stand on the other issues that have been
> posted to the list last week?  I expect to post a new batch of 5 on Monday.


Decisions are definitely good things! And I'm looking forward to the 
next batch - we are all working out some kinks on how we discuss these 
items, but that's not terribly surprising, and it will improve as we 
move ahead. That said, my current plan is to step in only where 
consensus is not clear. For issues like 34, 35, 36, and 39, the 
consensus seems straightforward. Any reason not to stay with that plan? 
If an issue is closed prematurely because of a misread on consensus, 
definitely make sure I'm aware (in case I miss it myself).

-Heather