Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [v3] Please help review v3 files

[Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]>]

Hi Martin,

On 2019-08-07 05:13, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, at 07:03, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>> These figures are plain artwork. I've tested adding this CSS after the
>> a.pilcrow {} stanza:
>> 
>>  .artwork .pilcrow {
>>  float: right;
>>  }
>> 
>> and moving the pilcrow up before the <pre>; that gives a pilcrow to the
>> right of the artwork, without reducing the artwork width. Would that
>> work for you?
> 
> What I did instead (and you can see that here:
> https://martinthomson.github.io/i-d-template/sample2.html#section-appendix.a-26)
> is make <pre> outside of <figure> use inline-block. I'd use flexbox,
> but apparently that isn't available.

Right.

However, it seems to me that this will make the bare <artwork> narrower than
figure artwork, which is a concern.

> There's lots of reasons not to use float

What are those?  Modern style frameworks like bootstrap 4 uses float to good
effect, and I seem to remember that when float was introduced it was hailed
as a good thing.

>, and keeping the pilcrow
> after the paragraph is better from a content-model perspective.

You'll have to say more to give me a sense of why it's actually better?

I'll agree that a placement at the end matches user expectancy better, but
that's of course hard if you don't want it floating right, and don't want
the blank line.


	Henrik