Re: [xml2rfc-dev] Fwd: Please help review v3 files: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09, draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15, & draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13

Hi Tom, all,

Right now, we’re looking primarily at the XML itself, and whether the XML is introducing any unexpected behavior in the outputs. That means the scope for looking at the outputs is the relationship the output has to the XML. Any feedback beyond that (aesthetics, feature enhancement requests) will be gratefully received, but is not our highest priority.

We want to make sure the conversation from v2 to v3 results in the XML people would expect to see.

Hope that helps,
Heather

> On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:08 AM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Can you remind us of the criteria for evaluation? Are they written down anywhere? Are mobile devices part of the review?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 1:54 AM, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com <mailto:sginoza@amsl.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> A few more files for review.  Our previous notes continue to apply.  Additionally, note that draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/staff/edit_draft.php?draft=draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15> demonstrates the use of <!— comments —> is sometimes problematic, as some text may disappears.  We have reported this issue..  
>> 
>> 
>> Files related to draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.html> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.pdf <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.pdf>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.txt>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.xml <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.xml> 
>> 
>> Diff files:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3-xmldiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3-xmldiff.html> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Files related to draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15: 
>> https://www.rfc-editor..org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.html> 
>> https://www..rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.pdf <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.pdf> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.txt> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.xml <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.xml> 
>> 
>> Diff files:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3-xmldiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3-xmldiff.html> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3-alt-htmlwdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3-alt-htmlwdiff.html> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Files related to draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.html> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.pdf <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.pdf> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.txt> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.xml <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.xml> 
>> 
>> Diff files:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3-xmldiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3-xmldiff.html> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Sandy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com <mailto:sginoza@amsl.com>>
>>> Subject: Please help review v3 file: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12
>>> Date: August 5, 2019 at 4:30:02 PM PDT
>>> To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
>>> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>>
>>> 
>>> Hi again,
>>> 
>>> Continuing with our request to review XMLv3 files, we’d appreciate your input regarding draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12.  We’re hoping some of you will take the time to review the files and provide feedback regarding whether the updates are as expected and the XMLv3 files are considered “good” v3 files.  
>>> 
>>> NOTEs:  
>>> - As previously mentioned, we are aware there is an issue w/ sectionFormat.
>>> Example: text is missing from the output (Section 3.1) after this XML
>>> <xref target="RFC3550" sectionFormat="comma" section="6.3.7"/>
>>> 
>>> - Although it gives an error currently, our understanding is that using xref in this manner (or similar) to create a link to a specific section of an I-D will be possible (without relying on the target attribute of the corresponding reference), per discussion with Henrik.
>>> <xref target="RTP-STREAMS" sectionFormat="of" section="5.4"/>
>>> 
>>> - we focused on format only; we did not make editorial updates. 
>>> 
>>> - the diff files compare the initial v2v3 output with the files we edited.
>>> 
>>> Please review the following files related to draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12:
>>> 
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/d>
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.pdf <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.pdf>
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.txt>
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.xml <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.xml>
>>> 
>>> Diff files:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3-xmldiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3-xmldiff.html>
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sandy 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> xml2rfc-dev mailing list
>> xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc-dev mailing list
> xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev