IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc-dev] progressing RFC 7991 (and friends)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 05 June 2020 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE693A07AF; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYCP03wdD_V9; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8446D3A0755; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1591372719; bh=tkOGG9MTRSubPZ9sEaraHUGp2pHwxCfxinWq0j3qpwc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BeII+PjELu3HQaVppESu7HaiLi+3V+tLcuv0mVcnxST7GzTn04JwqEo0+Z3UREvQI /TA1DpEIWRDxDLTBljigf+mJgC2am/6Z9t6PO5DjAd0bkjEIC8HdK3vR57gYyOIN9j wbi/hvu88GKbsaDiduoCkQoODwEcsEysZ4cJZ8Zc=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.152.96]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MiJZE-1j4LUH2JM6-00fOva; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:58:39 +0200
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
References: <8fd7f1ba-96a7-e3fa-29a6-32fe47b5cad5@gmx.de> <1DF69700-3713-40B8-9A70-818F69483733@tzi.org> <640cdf3e-391f-7e9e-df9c-c093c0f2d2c6@gmx.de> <F35611D4-4248-411D-87F3-F6D820E737F9@tzi.org> <6233f397-e633-a885-fefc-d3a03ba1823d@gmx.de> <62DBE093-BE05-4BAA-A400-C939072F1E33@bangj.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <2058e96c-ca75-a1a0-3bc9-19a9939d06bb@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:58:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <62DBE093-BE05-4BAA-A400-C939072F1E33@bangj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:exKv+1bBc61YAGjcVyAl5K8iGSQLuKcJQqRRkVfUY/wc2NiMLql A9WjhqJZn2kOVoNdPfDYDF+On+zkhhbMk7MWzcrJZVE+5budVG9ZH9n51lMON2TdnrBoWJO WzbcnGACmx/px79XzrYcElc2UdYqNiszNlDWfFJLOSReBwZJn4Zc82EFmstI2pEE0cZ4bym EP1adoZq0F8dAmpD/vXzQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Hd/DNFo812I=:w2qdrzDSBPpO+85fCJzbzG KTaB4gi8pqBmtL/wxEsE5d9qpgquf1uBUb2EjS6ZjoJ2jXx4+Q5OtIz9TZLqYyPuXY66dJCyO Udll45yAUqlnTASQIh7m7VqkBORw8FRYATEiYipwp5wzhsJP3RDTmFK5ooeDawHQwdajqpGjp cxKqXqUmh3HRYR6cRjE48c5VpBlOquVZzGLwERjsqgiNQr1V1zci3sHcIMmUSk1TXZ4qlCFVd 9Sby0CKDW0vdPxnxVFHTsd5Wl9UEMhKnF/OIy7nbZ6Yok+tiulNCSHFimXd6xvDKJSYkpghbC cyESrkCT9aDZ7+9MlqEpQlXyGEOD9O+UN99StoXsrqHFCi2Hv2KkpQIcwtjH6yHNxZZJtuhcH v4OV9084paXpEiNAQxXDnloFRuo9Qgan91P/wzWxl6ffnL2kyhbQOXyLP6Y8n7ZnKTYH2AbhA 1v8WLc5yeB1p29pL+fDD6GOXcMQfzAV8RSmFKUXdLXMEFJVb8AQxt3oYgFYABdxIGEHzY+dXw OFv4ng4+Ac1Tz7Eo4pod/2k9xEY2efaHsezim8w2F2zOg2rtUoFrsjkISKjfIUQgx8QBEQGE5 1MUG8Na68+pwc1AUq9SYcnnc+x45QZgLkOVKCaElS8+A8eY4M6t3KCrTIDaH+FW4tMD0j7EFn PlfeWMRc6s5+5QdzBLFiwFbNkE0/rQFl9H0a1XAEq7kEUe4CkiPVYPf2CF1YTQjvCZcPi4NGd 7UEFnDdBcc1oiG9yTGhFWxeYkfsr0AkUOV+GVGTAAsEy2NwwetxrNkN21xveplwgjZ2Q6vv53 R7wTDJT/Izy+eJQy9NIIF0q92RmVcs/adp9BDzwXVTpu9+lODOI9ZUfdl9ZAw0vk/zOT9WnCz A0hjeoekxTky/lJ67gHdrEgwmFKrOjXHRYJsXRoJTlU8Gh5FUwCoRbqlvEdvXKmYn9zyYpH4E YpjFbLjkVNAfShrN4Bvk/ZyZOOfYTg1tOq0CJKAxkePcRkTNKdKrtnIwOUrJO2u+UFmp8ZJJt F6TAdnqI2FKCTeQbiFuEG8KPHm5oFXe/aUzF6poylxiTIh3G3+xShMr/74VuA/il2X95vfRdn UVPXLzygPj0jQ8GxhJ1/4hmRsYhd+1qmqOJyZMa/FSJcKm9bsy3yZdKRlPePHKRH+rycZqaTj zsOHdlQhTQLGCdH/+BD9e9zSdbwz16KpoZqsZN+22KF/aUeEiUnjojUSjmSo5u2sssyi4hyu0 jk22rK5Kx+FNVcpgP
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/TXDPB46OmrXs0TvCqFU6Dxp0xzE>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] progressing RFC 7991 (and friends)
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 15:58:48 -0000

On 05.06.2020 17:11, Tom Pusateri wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 5, 2020, at 9:32 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 05.06.2020 15:23, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Will try to.
>>>
>>> Just as a random data point, my biggest problem with V3 at the moment is that I only can use a subset of human names in acknowledgements or other running text (I want to use Vigenère ciphers! :-); doing some more work here would be appreciated.
>>> ...
>>
>> I agree that xml2rfc's approach to disallow non-ASCII except in very
>> limited cases is problematic.
>
>
> It seems like we all agree on this but it never changes.
>
> xml2rfc should not be doing any non-ascii checking anywhere.
>
> v3 documents should be UTF-8.

All I can say is that my recollection of the discussions was that we did
not want to enforce anything about non-ASCII characters in grammar or
implementation.

<u> was first discussed as feature to make it easier to talk about
non-ASCII characters (automatically inserting long names, etc), with
which I agree. Disallowing non-ASCII outside <u> (and example
artwork/sourcecode) IMHO goes too far.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email