[xml2rfc-dev] putting page ranges into references, was: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-10#section-3.1.21

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 01.11.2019 18:47, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
> Is it correct that this mail refers to the following use of <seriesInfo>?

Nope. This mail thread was about how RFC 7991 tries to re-purpose
seriesInfo to also control the metadata for the document itself.

(adjusting subject line)

>            <seriesInfoname="Cryptology and Network Security"value="pp.
> 142-157"/>
>
> Is there a preferred handling here?  Annotation?  The output is slightly
> different when using <annotation>.
>
> Using <seriesInfo> (published):
>
>     [Oreo]     Berkman, O., Pinkas, B., and M. Yung, "Firm Grip
>                Handshakes: A Tool for Bidirectional Vouching", Cryptology
>                and Network Security pp. 142-157, 2012.

I would say using seriesInfo for this would be an abuse of the element.

> Using <annotation>:
> [Oreo]
>     Berkman, O., Pinkas, B., and M. Yung, "Firm Grip Handshakes: A Tool
>     for Bidirectional Vouching", 2012. Cryptology and Network Security
>     pp. 142-157.

Yes, <annotation> adds text to the end.

There <refcontent> (see
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#element.refcontent>).
However, RFC 7991 fails to state where it goes (before or after
<seriesInfo>). I believe xml2rfc puts it before, which doesn't help you
here.

See <https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/78>.

Best regards, Julian