Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] SVG broken (Re: New xml2rfc release: v2.45.0)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3F93A11AA; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O_YkOtwVcHev; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9CE3A11A9; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id s88so1507008pjb.5; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CpUku3ZdPq2HSt3j4A2YJNeryBJoOuUC0Hezs8OsBwE=; b=DoiK9jITejOSaS4h7OedMQ0N24Gz8+KZHQzYsmgW/sfgHGDYFdz7SKI3s5aSAz6sKL tiwn3mgwRQcKgEGQuOG1axdsLvxGx6+HiF6Dxfu10gX+8Buq1BIzQIK/qkCEosyj7jIH avn4em/b55VfNcumlS9pEWHbmkR3abNLDalOZtcrAwLs31IwSre83lpsutiR9oI+d3w7 ebkj0OJbdTxuB90i1s5ZQE9NfLeeXxpwsZGKFwtrsbZahY0AZ2xeY0Qs82M69xirFu/z zs5JqvS5i9hi8A90J/hu8y414eh+YQxJFQ5X9up/O34e+Z0lbqGbLRowkSxOvEpaoxD6 zH9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CpUku3ZdPq2HSt3j4A2YJNeryBJoOuUC0Hezs8OsBwE=; b=rQq62Pubk5pgzCvF5CPFMdbEZBuP4ZezXVZr6fQTh/RmUQHR7or7sd3fS0zq5VrbS/ tNPcYJL32QTahTTrAQHQLPtCWb9W6jsQOAZNSX6BgAOSViNOoMJ8nBbNp6Ax+qw5SZ9l JWKps1nXhP3Qjd61dXIIYtNtQKBkXQZhTXRlnlhcMCeisWcF86/3LcgCCXHuKYCRiK09 Ch9NT8xzlTkX7g23HT0FMxCDq+MbnVmpAnR58XV4NkuMHJoN1F2NHNMTKHMZ8iTu91ix Laac6SFfTLXsItT+HsGfyci7D7vaiSsdp8z+H359svmkzuBTbqRE57sFdcIw/9/jb8oC YmNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PYmYMvgm+d0OpP0JHr4LGTaz8jvIfYGxReq0eV41A/aSm4cay wphNi/dPcKEiSTqw6d54dVk3s3uJs2g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWbUUJhR4+n2NDiAZZb3TMcUipZkSG/K3sDsJp6Q60RPpX7oOk4smXcZecpuUwQbvXD1upUg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fd85:: with SMTP id cx5mr11549770pjb.146.1590794686599; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.12.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t201sm5374063pfc.104.2020.05.29.16.24.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2020 16:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: rfc-markdown@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
References: <E1jduEw-0007if-7I@durif.tools.ietf.org> <93E5295E-CE96-4121-B3F5-C04540D542FD@tzi.org> <D6806E5D-2B6E-4464-9126-44F3F5C808F7@tzi.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1a5cfced-2718-0a4a-41ef-b366543ec5a2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 11:24:40 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D6806E5D-2B6E-4464-9126-44F3F5C808F7@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/jNvDp6ComWgXl4wnGKB7azKTxbI>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] SVG broken (Re: New xml2rfc release: v2.45.0)
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 23:24:49 -0000

Do you know what bit of SVG it is barfing on?

I'm curious because I've done some personal patching of svgcheck and discovered what a minefield this all is. Indeed, some drawing tools produce stuff that others don't, so there is a strong element of crapshoot.

Regards
   Brian

On 30-May-20 09:29, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-05-29, at 21:56, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>>
>> I no longer get SVG through this version that has been “repaired” by svgcheck -qra; the SVG processing now seems very picky.  (I haven’t updated since 2.39, so this might have happened earlier.)
> 
> Well, OK, this is now SVG generated by ditaa instead of goat, and ditaa seems to want to show of its knowledge of SVG some more.  So that may not be a change in xml2rfc at all.  My question is mostly still valid, though:
> 
>> Is svgcheck still intended to be the tool to be used with xml2rfc to make SVG palatable to it?  Is that being updated along with xml2rfc ...?
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc mailing list
> xml2rfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc
>