Re: [xml2rfc-dev] SVG broken (Re: New xml2rfc release: v2.45.0)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 29 May 2020 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB5E3A10BD; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3fIsErjFyCM; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CE63A10BC; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.112] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49Yd4253qQzyVK; Fri, 29 May 2020 23:29:06 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <93E5295E-CE96-4121-B3F5-C04540D542FD@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 23:29:06 +0200
Cc: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org, rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 612480546.2601579-5f6d26a63098ed057328a975374b2901
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D6806E5D-2B6E-4464-9126-44F3F5C808F7@tzi.org>
References: <E1jduEw-0007if-7I@durif.tools.ietf.org> <93E5295E-CE96-4121-B3F5-C04540D542FD@tzi.org>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/rgNb1nRBywGX5CAHk0pt-DG-s_E>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] SVG broken (Re: New xml2rfc release: v2.45.0)
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 21:29:11 -0000

On 2020-05-29, at 21:56, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> I no longer get SVG through this version that has been “repaired” by svgcheck -qra; the SVG processing now seems very picky.  (I haven’t updated since 2.39, so this might have happened earlier.)

Well, OK, this is now SVG generated by ditaa instead of goat, and ditaa seems to want to show of its knowledge of SVG some more.  So that may not be a change in xml2rfc at all.  My question is mostly still valid, though:

> Is svgcheck still intended to be the tool to be used with xml2rfc to make SVG palatable to it?  Is that being updated along with xml2rfc ...?

Grüße, Carsten