Re: [xml2rfc] [xml] should render?

[Anders Rundgren <[e-mail]>]

On 2019-09-16 10:17, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 16.09.2019 10:05, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>>
>> On 2019-09-16 09:07, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>>> When i click [xml]
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-09
>>> I get (when using Chrome but not strangely not when using Firefox):
>>> ERROR: /rfc/front/date/@month missing (and XSLT processor cannot compute the system date)
>>>
>>> IMO, [xml] should provide the XML "as is" for people with interests in checking or "borrowing" and not try to render.
>>> The "tool tip" also says: 'XML source for this document'
>>
>> You're very swift with very definitive statements.
>>
>> Here, what's happening is that the server is serving you XML "as is".  Your
>> browser is then applying the XSLT stylesheet you have specified in your
>> submitted XML.  Don't blame the server for that.
> 
> Right.
> 
> This is a shortcoming of Chrome; see
> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html#xslt.engines.browser>
> and <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079> (reported 2005, still
> marked as "new").

Well, I couldn't really know that.

Don't take it wrong, but I believe that indicates what Google thinks of XSLT.
It is not a problem though, I just pushed every button to see where it took me :-)

Thanx,
Anders

> 
> Best regards, Julian
>