IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xml2rfc] Slides for edu presentation on xml2rfc in Dallas

julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Tue, 14 March 2006 04:25 UTC

From: "julian.reschke at gmx.de"
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:25:58 +0000
Subject: [xml2rfc] Slides for edu presentation on xml2rfc in Dallas
In-Reply-To: <A427D1CE-E02B-4E6D-BE90-1DC57EF1BE58@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <4415FA14.3080202@dial.pipex.com> <44168090.4050001@gmx.de> <44169BDE.4010009@dial.pipex.com> <44169E48.1090000@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603141333200.27120@netcore.fi> <4416B2C8.2050209@gmx.de> <A427D1CE-E02B-4E6D-BE90-1DC57EF1BE58@lurchi.franken.de>
Message-ID: <4416B60A.2000403@gmx.de>
X-Date: Tue Mar 14 04:25:58 2006

Michael Tuexen wrote:
> Julian,
> 
> what is the alternative to
> 
> <references title='Normative References'>
> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1321" ?>
> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2104" ?>
> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119" ?>
> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2960" ?>
> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3436" ?>
> <?rfc include="reference.FIPS.180-1.1995" ?>
> </references>
> 
> which I find pretty convenient...
> 
> Best regards
> Michael

I didn't argue with it being convenient :-).

The alternative is...:

<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
   <!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC '' 
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml'>
]>

and then....

<references>
   &rfc2119;
</references>

Best regards, Julian
>From Michael.Tuexen at lurchi.franken.de  Tue Mar 14 13:36:05 2006
From: Michael.Tuexen at lurchi.franken.de (Michael Tuexen)
Date: Tue Mar 14 04:36:13 2006
Subject: [xml2rfc] Slides for edu presentation on xml2rfc in Dallas
In-Reply-To: <4416B60A.2000403@gmx.de>
References: <4415FA14.3080202@dial.pipex.com> <44168090.4050001@gmx.de>
	<44169BDE.4010009@dial.pipex.com> <44169E48.1090000@gmx.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0603141333200.27120@netcore.fi> <4416B2C8.2050209@gmx.de>
	<A427D1CE-E02B-4E6D-BE90-1DC57EF1BE58@lurchi.franken.de>
	<4416B60A.2000403@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <F2F8B573-1C0C-4D4C-9AAD-97B99829AA8F@lurchi.franken.de>

Seems to be usable... I'm normally doing copy&paste and then change
the number.

But I have to change the URL, if the references are moved to a  
different location,
this is not the case with the <?rfc ...> stuff, right?

Best regards
Michael

On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> Julian,
>> what is the alternative to
>> <references title='Normative References'>
>> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1321" ?>
>> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2104" ?>
>> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119" ?>
>> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2960" ?>
>> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3436" ?>
>> <?rfc include="reference.FIPS.180-1.1995" ?>
>> </references>
>> which I find pretty convenient...
>> Best regards
>> Michael
>
> I didn't argue with it being convenient :-).
>
> The alternative is...:
>
> <!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
>   <!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC '' 'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/ 
> bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml'>
> ]>
>
> and then....
>
> <references>
>   &rfc2119;
> </references>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email