Re: [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back?
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 16:04 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE413A040C for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnrGd_1VJjrS for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0061E3A041E for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A507862196; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id J+P5ndAcMUh6; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:03:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1510262162; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:03:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
References: <f91ec5f1-bfb6-20d9-92d9-06bb7c4c3839@htt-consult.com> <95b07998-22e3-dd37-5973-4bd96ff5bee0@gmx.de>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <e2f2e7cc-2189-8746-7c6b-ff5c932afb6f@htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 12:03:54 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <95b07998-22e3-dd37-5973-4bd96ff5bee0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/GSOS8XElP-MLZjL6zLYcrTvjB3E>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 16:04:34 -0000
On 5/21/20 11:51 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 21.05.2020 17:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Carsten mentioned that Acknowledgments now belong in the back: >> >> "the Acknowledgements section to the back material, as now required by >> RFC 7322 Section 4.10 [1]" >> >> But in the draft I am currently working on in xml2rfc --v3 >> >> draft-moskowitz-orchid-cshake-01.xml(361): Error: Invalid attribute >> numbered for element section, at /rfc/back/section[2] >> draft-moskowitz-orchid-cshake-01.xml(13): Error: Invalid document before >> running preptool. >> >> I put the Acknowledgements after my one appendix in the back. >> >> The Acknowledgements section starts with: >> >> <section numbered="no" toc="default"> <name>Acknowledgments</name> >> >> I also tried: >> >> <section numbered="no" anchor="acknowledgments" title="Acknowledgments"> >> >> >> Same error. >> >> >> What perhaps am I doing wrong? > > See > <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#element.section.attribute.numbered>. > > Try > > numbered="false" Thanks. That was the needed piece of magic... > > Best regards, Julian > >
- [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back? Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back? Robert Moskowitz