[xml2rfc] 1.31 formatting nit

jabley at ca.afilias.info (Joe Abley) Sun, 27 August 2006 12:26 UTC

From: jabley at ca.afilias.info (Joe Abley)
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:26:19 +0000
Subject: [xml2rfc] 1.31 formatting nit
In-Reply-To: <09ED21E6-D785-4F35-81F0-2DC37A1BEBEE@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
References: <c1468ac50608260546u59e5c80aj2ef5391b2c055de8@mail.gmail.com> <44F059AC.3090908@dial.pipex.com> <C56365B2-F267-4258-ABAC-1352101EAD83@dbc.mtview.ca.us> <44F1EEDC.9010307@dial.pipex.com> <09ED21E6-D785-4F35-81F0-2DC37A1BEBEE@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Message-ID: <10DF1CFB-43A6-4BED-95D0-9B3B8046D971@ca.afilias.info>
X-Date: Sun Aug 27 12:26:19 2006

On 27-Aug-2006, at 15:18, Marshall Rose wrote:

>> Uh, probably!  I hadn't noticed this one and can't find it in the  
>> documentation.
>> What does it do?
>
> well, i'd say look at the README file...

The string option isn't listed in <http://xml.resource.org/authoring/ 
README.html>. That document announces itself as being "1.32pre1",  
which seems odd (but it seems plausible to assume it incorporates  
features found in 1.31).

So what does <?rfc string='yes' >? do?


Joe
>From mrose at dbc.mtview.ca.us  Sun Aug 27 23:28:18 2006
From: mrose at dbc.mtview.ca.us (Marshall Rose)
Date: Sun Aug 27 12:28:27 2006
Subject: [xml2rfc] 1.31 formatting nit
In-Reply-To: <10DF1CFB-43A6-4BED-95D0-9B3B8046D971@ca.afilias.info>
References: <c1468ac50608260546u59e5c80aj2ef5391b2c055de8@mail.gmail.com>
	<44F059AC.3090908@dial.pipex.com>
	<C56365B2-F267-4258-ABAC-1352101EAD83@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
	<44F1EEDC.9010307@dial.pipex.com>
	<09ED21E6-D785-4F35-81F0-2DC37A1BEBEE@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
	<10DF1CFB-43A6-4BED-95D0-9B3B8046D971@ca.afilias.info>
Message-ID: <C31E731B-57DC-47A3-B48B-8925465A14A0@dbc.mtview.ca.us>

it's 'strict', not 'string'.

/mtr