[xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back?

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123893A0D78 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MtNI8g-2PROq for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDF83A0D77 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF2D62196 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:23:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25uydNrZ+YpJ for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:23:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6739662162 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:23:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <f91ec5f1-bfb6-20d9-92d9-06bb7c4c3839@htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 11:23:40 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/PwpsJqxuiPRYIOLq02uv8UFizs0>
Subject: [xml2rfc] Acknowledgments in Back?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 15:24:00 -0000

Carsten mentioned that Acknowledgments now belong in the back:

"the Acknowledgements section to the back material, as now required by 
RFC 7322 Section 4.10 [1]"

But in the draft I am currently working on in xml2rfc --v3

draft-moskowitz-orchid-cshake-01.xml(361): Error: Invalid attribute 
numbered for element section, at /rfc/back/section[2]
draft-moskowitz-orchid-cshake-01.xml(13): Error: Invalid document before 
running preptool.

I put the Acknowledgements after my one appendix in the back.

The Acknowledgements section starts with:

<section numbered="no" toc="default"> <name>Acknowledgments</name>

I also tried:

<section numbered="no" anchor="acknowledgments" title="Acknowledgments">


Same error.


What perhaps am I doing wrong?