Re: [xml2rfc] RfcMarkup not authoritative, HTML is gone?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 16 September 2019 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3369712081D for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GG2K-v-qJo2i for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDDC512012A for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1568648608; bh=Hrk8WK240/ZwiQZ6iAYkegp4FHBW1SmMbN5bgEv7g+E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=JA9F9SY94GJ6Jl4DZ8+CZ237l00yhVtYwqlKgUpiaK3XLUTQjQBPiJyLucE4cgG2e RDSCwh4QYW4NeV2YoxfQIgNimafiIAG//MwzbBcx/fO5IVE7aac1bOx33mW/neKQUy IgJULkIWjE50Btj7cJoArKdciA++sBt2i2F3jB98=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([93.203.231.165]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lf0M7-1iRaz12b55-00qmgU; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:43:28 +0200
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, xml2rfc@ietf.org
References: <94358f7d-3465-4161-1597-f1dbfba73b3f@gmail.com> <d44ac5f1-e4c2-1239-4bea-714a721115b8@levkowetz.com> <9ceb0697-c3ae-4f14-606c-4e089f04e2f2@gmail.com> <a4874a50-ffc3-80f5-cb42-09f82072644c@gmx.de> <04713f10-5c19-2ad5-2fa6-2db5f1ed5599@gmail.com> <f5554cd0-9c74-3a8c-5af9-25b947d499d8@gmx.de> <7bb2a5fb-262d-39b5-3bb0-72e068923ea7@gmail.com> <c3c8db0e-e719-32e6-ca3c-736e25ce8936@gmx.de> <f2f49552-091d-50e4-e2e2-2fdd30cbb7ae@gmail.com> <bd07ad5a-a0a7-f821-54ec-c09ee5614e2a@gmx.de> <d9883584-1d5e-4d34-9bde-00d32dc49435@gmail.com> <599cb714-89e8-271c-4d5e-ba294fa7d3cf@alum.mit.edu> <ee1a1699-a5e3-3c2b-ad53-ff80a120f7eb@gmail.com> <dcf93ec6-bb2c-3323-a98d-41c9bcdc4e8d@gmx.de> <f9fad0ca-bfdb-33a3-411e-c411608ae96f@gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <dde6f0eb-36b7-c1a8-2062-9309ebaa68a3@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:43:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f9fad0ca-bfdb-33a3-411e-c411608ae96f@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:yILDXPtso1sRbuJ+QdfA5QbhYnn+jM29FvwQPvdYHUhEsHmmALw cJdquXNRD0kVpQ3Uu2blpbQ2aZpOEda44z/ne5XehvxH9bBnAQUuDKGqdsxss4ACL52Rlbd Jf+QVg5SuScceGQEigLD4skBjejL9MSIRLuQm8qS4erZn/DO9ZY69TYMAWY06tw8BHFezJC sYcaBPn6ViokzvhvOtO5A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:dCDg4Ovo4tE=:excK6aGFVHbtCUfnK3TUD5 XRz93XpV8UMw+XeTnIKJgc90d0KgjYdLDaT0Zxy/aqCEYlm4TcoZBskdWZYc+OE70Y+q9haLG yHT/lw5S/UgA50bYJrUpQg6k4eK3JCAYVZfoP9EXEYBg38pP3f/cA0vuIR9ARjAmsMHtJIlb2 scxG84pwgUH5wnVSholzfpMEZP9DRVufRuzOLCBvdZ9k+5AObHavZiGQW0baubli5XlBSubXn aeFwxhE7joFTBx9AsRHoETvaibxZfFrkn0UN/iZYvOJ28KYOxxZsBgQROiUE2bJ5H9iT8yXUo dNk6RTo7/VFjSsOU0Y3D4T8zcd5Bj1TJQogu8sue0aNimyq0Cj06M7AOz6JEJcgyJa3xqPvaK arncTMVeV0MKJoUa1Qhl04EFV03JHvrQW4mBlPxqp40Lufgh6/oucDln/Y8XXlQ9U13la26Vv WOogOu1Fgw9srZ1TLBTWfLhCUoPm7qQMzb0Uulc2CI8bdy1AGJCepXWZMS1CQtBe6rJfYXtY5 dEufYO/6HeA9uQnlouJDZ+XGGszD3vkWCGpc6rIRUIQMcjspC9tpwqyb8EKc4rWwxG/cMp0gs 5c2v1fAkmJHd5d5AZG4sQ1rHwcdEtHfBYNcAEJ6KyNhs5gKyUlTDTpFzDYk4NsUpTD36DJrVF 8ncqtZpMfPTTaYShM68Jwc16X8AytIYrFJgnq7ZcgUMyy907aJPyCE0Wm0lDvLVR5CWjnCCbL XYyaqRwsUAWzz1GQr+gpd/Y2t90t31aw5nuSvdAQzZ+a8EYNabVYX+bqOYTgonCMfqhq6vFb0 dgilbvjdLK8jjl1p3duyyl78iJQ1q1U6bGmzBli83gjVkZL2qYwh7/GId19qKMnCv5Aoak1dK aAJnydyy9xTNn8o3+lZnuKwemWO/oMEK0Ao0HHhrZIHkU2PVP+1yMhgAUwHPt5kYULoj6jqBP K8LCUZwOYmPD5RPg/e38nBx7tor5cQNvudmcqHha7zxcMb2YaGPIbH92ZvASWJhkObk86i2cq 9suAuUZCVLwE27yhKy9ohsQ8RqkAiOrD0B9ork7X78L4cQJ6XkIzBqZXOyGSlOHtJrFTQL+Mt 9aKnqfDuta5S1tmRvSHyfYS5++ZypBoGpqlMFOrUq0p4FWvSFCiOWSOibCISAed4Q3X529Ck6 vhxAPOFeFmEIQBrd3FVSgIfCsCRIuRF5ComD8Fn9a0g1/ldf4SAOf1Ltlc6FykbqMIsVYXZR1 mOIrijsc0S3Qw/ZXfs43wjalgzQdLA9931phSDyI8H1y9soatk6NVSpqvpWs=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/QINLqj18MV8-hImilP7o7P9XDVM>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RfcMarkup not authoritative, HTML is gone?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:43:40 -0000

On 16.09.2019 17:33, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> ...
> I don't think the motives for using HTML has been very strong.
> ...

And you did re-read the epic discussion that lead to this decision?

> ...
> Is there actually a single RFC out there using SVG and Unicode?
> ...

Yes, there is one for non-ASCII, if that's what you're asking. That
said, how is this relevant when in fact it wasn't possible to do so up
until now?

> Anyway, I surely look forward to HTML!
>
> Lists currently look a bit "crammed" in my opinion:
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rundgren-signed-http-requests-00.html

Looking at the source:

> <meta name="generator" content="xml2rfc version 2.21.0 - https://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc" />

The lists indeed look crammed, but what you're looking at is the HTML
output in the "v2" mode, which we'll hopefully won't be using anymore
soonish.

Best regards, Julian