[xml2rfc] 1.31 formatting nit

jabley at ca.afilias.info (Joe Abley) Sun, 27 August 2006 12:40 UTC

From: jabley at ca.afilias.info (Joe Abley)
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:40:45 +0000
Subject: [xml2rfc] 1.31 formatting nit
In-Reply-To: <C31E731B-57DC-47A3-B48B-8925465A14A0@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
References: <c1468ac50608260546u59e5c80aj2ef5391b2c055de8@mail.gmail.com> <44F059AC.3090908@dial.pipex.com> <C56365B2-F267-4258-ABAC-1352101EAD83@dbc.mtview.ca.us> <44F1EEDC.9010307@dial.pipex.com> <09ED21E6-D785-4F35-81F0-2DC37A1BEBEE@dbc.mtview.ca.us> <10DF1CFB-43A6-4BED-95D0-9B3B8046D971@ca.afilias.info> <C31E731B-57DC-47A3-B48B-8925465A14A0@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Message-ID: <70274941-74B9-4239-B9FF-FA1A20BFB7B4@ca.afilias.info>
X-Date: Sun Aug 27 12:40:45 2006

On 27-Aug-2006, at 15:28, Marshall Rose wrote:

> it's 'strict', not 'string'.

The mists of confusion have cleared, thank you :-)