Re: [xml2rfc] Inline use of <sourcecode>

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 18 January 2021 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5153A1338 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:43:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lihCbA1EeTz for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:43:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816B23A1100 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:43:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dc939.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DKCfr64YLzyXt; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:43:32 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <6cd50952-2c66-4ae2-ebf2-e8936b2f1abd@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:43:32 +0100
Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 632670212.028335-11310a0f6f380f366f408cce062dbd88
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E2127BE1-4F7F-4381-81FB-423D1EFA9A72@tzi.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2101181313160.26613@maria.rogerprice.org> <ee8a89be-24d7-d060-c237-47bb572743fc@gmx.de> <EE36349E-6F54-4F5F-9B97-9775C595188C@tzi.org> <6cd50952-2c66-4ae2-ebf2-e8936b2f1abd@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/fDW62wG1od5WpnrDIQEGLqvViKQ>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Inline use of <sourcecode>
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:43:37 -0000

> Interesting. Why does the conversion step touch elements that are not v2?

The conversion is meant to help with the transition and therefore allows mixtures of v2 and v3 elements.  Apparently, it tries to generate valid v3 in all cases.

Grüße, Carsten