Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-02

Lance Stout <lance@andyet.net> Mon, 16 June 2014 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lance@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30F51A002A for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e58YSmWR3JYy for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com [209.85.220.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 410181A001A for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fb1so2306992pad.0 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=blLKBT23udprCv0t08rFs5T6UlnaopJWv2IBu5iW0cI=; b=kgJRHGM/ZNy1eMKWR3BR9Tyh1blRnk0XSSoDLlNFfys8MMRk0eAZ3RmEB9GU4BEPf0 TSuQNKpcB6Dv21ZviCwBlKS4OJKxV++w0tXAhseUnVrhDyky4zwROWCV6wnzPxvE8YLE BoMXsbxnDprbI9MBhqhtuvi+GVu5FfKx94zesSifgcjQDlb25JFSE846r3/O7aS8VwxL gGDbB53/YKeIBAKxych1BjMtfilThoKV6fliGc6WJx+V9FVbqS/izFn491DYNVjOcyj/ 5TVic8S+54ygSAmxYARkd0qxTrSDaM18HYsWgcTQHpSElNb1vzijUmPABYUDZDusZpIE /P3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnINKjYXEODutCoO/+0qNZiYxRvTxJWv/cHfpHbAlrFWhmpa+FuYsthPOYeq6nbyB7YA00v
X-Received: by 10.66.136.131 with SMTP id qa3mr25756552pab.77.1402941306914; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.23] (66-191-14-77.static.knwc.wa.charter.com. [66.191.14.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fu12sm71959959pad.42.2014.06.16.10.55.00 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_613F959D-8123-4B3A-AE9F-08727101B067"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Lance Stout <lance@andyet.net>
In-Reply-To: <53960056.5080509@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:54:59 -0700
Message-Id: <C156456C-A710-41A6-9201-630DBC71412D@andyet.net>
References: <F8275190-9346-4879-9843-A3DF6C604F8C@nostrum.com> <9372C947-DE5D-4115-B1DD-3E1D216C9D62@nostrum.com> <9D46867E-ADA1-4530-AF23-B43AC6E68B3E@andyet.net> <6322B641-3846-4A62-9BBC-0A8A30F50DE6@nostrum.com> <5384D9E8.5000601@stpeter.im> <6FF542E9-904E-4997-936F-D4C61087179A@nostrum.com> <53921B7C.8080403@stpeter.im> <73438225-60E0-4301-ABD8-7AE8C8C7CDEE@nostrum.com> <0F867757-72F8-4961-9B0C-476F2987652C@andyet.net> <F9FC05B9-5446-41BE-A932-E3F1C3C4FF56@nostrum.com> <78B53C44-9C02-4CB3-9D45-48748CA75F54@andyet.net> <5395DAAE.8090906@stpeter.im> <EE86C568-3777-4F96-8A81-D317ABC25619@nostrum.com> <53960056.5080509@stpeter.im>
To: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/4GndarRJKbJNKTbONuYAJRFviNA
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-02
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:55:09 -0000

On Jun 9, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

>> 
>> Do you mean IETF Last Call? Or do you think we need to repeat the WGLC?
> 
> IETF. It's hard to keep track of which drafts are in which states. :-)


+1 for going to IETF Last Call