IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] review of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-12

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 29 August 2014 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DC31A078D; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iXe93xhAaVJl; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899EC1A0739; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [73.34.202.214]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 760F541237; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:09:24 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <5400C1A6.6030204@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:08:38 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, "xmpp@ietf.org" <xmpp@ietf.org>, "precis@ietf.org" <precis@ietf.org>
References: <CFFEBEEE.575AE%jhildebr@cisco.com> <5400B894.8050007@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <5400B894.8050007@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/56Br1k2j9uKX-2zniFmC9ZAhFf0
Subject: Re: [xmpp] review of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-12
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:08:40 -0000

On 8/29/14, 11:29 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> On 7/30/14, 3:25 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:

<snip/>

>>   > 6.  IANA Considerations
>>   >
>>   >    The following completed templates provide the information
>> necessary
>>   >    for the IANA to add 'JIDlocalIdentifierClass' and
>>   >    'JIDresourceFreeformClass' to the PRECIS Profiles Registry.
>>
>> Should we also ask them to mark the status of nodeprep and
>> resourceprep to
>> deprecated in the stringprep profiles registry?
>
> Yes.

RFC 3454 never considered that profiles would be marked as deprecated:

    IANA has set up a registry of stringprep profiles.  This registry is
    a single text file that lists the known profiles.  Each entry in the
    registry has three fields:

    - Profile name

    - RFC in which the profile is defined

    - Indicator whether or not this is the newest version of the profile

    Each version of a profile will remain listed in the registry forever.
    That is, if a new version of a profile supersedes an earlier version,
    both versions will continue to be listed in the registry, but the
    current version indicator will be turned off for the earlier version
    and turned on for the newer version.

Thus we might want to consult with IANA, the authors of RFC 3454, and 
the relevant Area Directors about how they would like to proceed.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email