Re: [xmpp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-05.txt

⌘ Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> Tue, 01 September 2015 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9CE1B4E93 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ylFnC-AtROt for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617011B3C68 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3206; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1441127969; x=1442337569; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QETKWHXGjfBfQwx5lnH4wxyq2N2FeK+mNwgnUtJK7v0=; b=G4I4cHTTjNrLX84FGmh88RnN9d2DBWRT+QuIKDVsUuhSgi/fsVcc9Fec Aelhd+yIytQ3UCvB8W+cruxr/TQqxgfEKUB6tD3c5S11v60ttNvNb9NCz AVrL0j82m6sfzvOIjXZQVxwEZB+3B2saNuPgRrB8tZdo9UC3nPPtGB++K w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANAwCb3eVV/4QNJK1TAQmDG1RpgyO7CwEJgW0KhXsCgUQ4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEEAQEBIEsbCxgCAgUhAgIPAhYwBg0EAgIBAQWIJQ20fZUHAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBARqBIopOhC4BERg6gmmBQwWMb3WHXYUHh26BSkaDbIJ8ikKHMiaCDh2Bcx8ELwGCTAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,450,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="28949393"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2015 17:19:14 +0000
Received: from [10.129.24.52] ([10.129.24.52]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t81HJCNc013215 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:19:12 GMT
Message-ID: <55E5DE0F.90904@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:19:11 -0600
From: =?UTF-8?B?4oyYIE1hdHQgTWlsbGVy?= <mamille2@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: XMPP Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
References: <20150901171239.15229.52617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150901171239.15229.52617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/DDJkbkhtrSwr5ZDSlGq3kHiAij4>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-05.txt
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:19:32 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Version -05 should address all of the IESG feedback.

It also changes the .well-known usage from
".well-known/posh.{service}.json" to
"./well-known/posh/{service}.json" by registering for the "posh"
.well-known and establishing a POSH Service Names registry.

An upcoming revision to draft-ietf-xmpp-dna will actually register the
"xmpp-client" and "xmpp-server" POSH service names.


- -- 
- - m&m

Matt Miller < mamille2@cisco.com >
Cisco Systems, Inc.

On 9/1/15 11:12 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Messaging
> and Presence Protocol Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> Title           : PKIX over Secure HTTP (POSH) Authors         :
> Matthew Miller Peter Saint-Andre Filename        :
> draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-05.txt Pages           : 17 Date            :
> 2015-09-01
> 
> Abstract: Experience has shown that it is difficult to deploy
> proper PKIX certificates for TLS in multi-tenant environments.  As
> a result, domains hosted in such environments often deploy
> applications using certificates that identify the hosting service,
> not the hosted domain.  Such deployments force end users and peer
> services to accept a certificate with an improper identifier,
> resulting in degraded security.  This document defines two methods
> that make it easier to deploy certificates for proper server
> identity checking in non-HTTP application protocols.  While these
> methods were developed for use in the Extensible Messaging and
> Presence Protocol (XMPP) as a Domain Name Association (DNA)
> prooftype, they might also be usable in other non-HTTP application
> protocols.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-posh/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at: 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-05
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at: 
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-05
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: 
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce
> mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft
> directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV5d4PAAoJEDWi+S0W7cO1CSwH/1RM0ki7SY5FwWKLos7a4l5/
6L/7Ko1JLZQvxWXQma2ruLrs4WA8z0T2prJ7J+SFkrRzXBSrtlhJZU3rFlqxT/e9
0aoZQCswTZNf6xoTgCo7z4LIngOy80Cix/MLgtGHNrdM432TPT5oUb6Qod1eDpTS
T3PmCvBVHc6tlwchZyNouLH9R1Bbyv3wuQGvHVHA/E0JtuOExK0uMHx4QuvM2jGF
MtD4UBW0vbl50qF0gp0B6ZfFz0KHCnQe2yw511OxxF77453LYtvOBPxm08ryA1yG
Pvk9KKpLQ9448zS3eCkrPflV+dfzQySVX70PgVYbeoynN68o4BWXdxGGiOslWzE=
=KJ/X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----